Factors associated with maternity waiting home use among women in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia: a multilevel cross-sectional analysis

被引:36
作者
Kurji, Jaameeta [1 ]
Gebretsadik, Lakew Abebe [2 ]
Wordofa, Muluemebet Abera [3 ]
Sudhakar, Morankar [2 ]
Asefa, Yisalemush [4 ]
Kiros, Getachew [2 ]
Mamo, Abebe [2 ]
Bergen, Nicole [5 ]
Asfaw, Shifera [2 ]
Bedru, Kunuz Haji [6 ]
Bulcha, Gebeyehu [6 ]
Labonte, Ronald [1 ]
Taljaard, Monica [7 ]
Kulkarni, Manisha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Jimma Univ, Dept Hlth Behav & Soc, Jimma, Ethiopia
[3] Jimma Univ, Dept Populat & Family Hlth, Jimma, Ethiopia
[4] Jimma Univ, Dept Hlth Econ Management & Policy, Jimma, Ethiopia
[5] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Jimma Zone Hlth Off, Jimma, Ethiopia
[7] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 08期
关键词
maternity waiting home; ethiopia; institutional births; epidemiology; obstetrics; community child health; HEALTH; CHILDBIRTH; MORTALITY; DETERMINANTS; EXPERIENCES; BARRIERS; REGIONS; EQUITY; AREAS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028210
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To identify individual-, household- and community-level factors associated with maternity waiting home (MWH) use in Ethiopia. Design Cross-sectional analysis of baseline household survey data from an ongoing cluster-randomised controlled trial using multilevel analyses. Setting Twenty-four rural primary care facility catchment areas in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Participants 3784 women who had a pregnancy outcome (live birth, stillbirth, spontaneous/induced abortion) 12 months prior to September 2016. Outcome measure The primary outcome was self-reported MWH use for any pregnancy; hypothesised factors associated with MWH use included woman's education, woman's occupation, household wealth, involvement in health-related decision-making, companion support, travel time to health facility and community-levels of institutional births. Results Overall, 7% of women reported past MWH use. Housewives (OR: 1.74, 95%CI 1.20 to 2.52), women with companions for facility visits (OR: 2.15, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.23), wealthier households (fourth vs first quintile OR: 3.20, 95%CI 1.93 to 5.33) and those with no health facility nearby or living >30min from a health facility (OR: 2.37, 95%CI 1.80 to 3.13) had significantly higher odds of MWH use. Education, decision-making autonomy and community-level institutional births were not significantly associated with MWH use. Conclusions Utilisation inequities exist; women with less wealth and companion support experienced more difficulties in accessing MWHs. Short duration of stay and failure to consider MWH as part of birth preparedness planning suggests local referral and promotion practices need investigation to ensure that women who would benefit the most are linked to MWH services.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Amsalu Gashaw, 2015, BMC Research Notes, V8, P22, DOI [10.1186/s13104-014-0965-z, 10.1186/s13104-015-1343-1]
  • [2] Maternity waiting areas - serving all women? Barriers and enablers of an equity-oriented maternal health intervention in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia
    Bergen, Nicole
    Abebe, Lakew
    Asfaw, Shifera
    Kiros, Getachew
    Kulkarni, Manisha A.
    Mamo, Abebe
    Morankar, Sudhakar
    Labonte, Ronald
    [J]. GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 14 (10) : 1509 - 1523
  • [3] Continuous support for women during childbirth
    Bohren, Meghan A.
    Hofmeyr, G. Justus
    Sakala, Carol
    Fukuzawa, Rieko K.
    Cuthbert, Anna
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (07):
  • [4] Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between maternity waiting home users and non-users at hospitals with and without a maternity waiting home: retrospective cohort study
    Braat, Floris
    Vermeiden, Tienke
    Getnet, Gashaw
    Schiffer, Rita
    van den Akker, Thomas
    Stekelenburg, Jelle
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2018, 10 (01): : 47 - 53
  • [5] The Social Determinants of Health: It's Time to Consider the Causes of the Causes
    Braveman, Paula
    Gottlieb, Laura
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2014, 129 : 19 - 31
  • [6] Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: designing, analyzing, and reporting cluster randomized controlled trials
    Brown, Andrew W.
    Li, Peng
    Brown, Michelle M. Bohan
    Kaiser, Kathryn A.
    Keith, Scott W.
    Oakes, J. Michael
    Allison, David B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2015, 102 (02) : 241 - 248
  • [7] Caglia J., 2014, Health extension workers in Ethiopia: Delivering community-based antenatal and postnatal care
  • [8] Central Statistical Agency and The DHS Program ICF, 2016, ETH DEM HLTH SURV 20
  • [9] Donner A., 2010, Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research
  • [10] Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health, 2010, HLTH SECT DEV PROGR