Validity of a commercial linear encoder to estimate bench press 1 RM from the force-velocity relationship

被引:0
作者
Bosquet, Laurent [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Porta-Benache, Jeremy [1 ]
Blais, Jerome [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Poitiers, Fac Sport Sci, F-86000 Poitiers, France
[2] Univ Montreal, Dept Kinesiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Sport Experts Assoc, Poitiers, France
[4] Univ Montreal, Dept Educ Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Muscle strength diagnosis; performance prediction; innovative technology; ONE REPETITION MAXIMUM; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; EXERCISE; MOVEMENT; STRENGTH; POWER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the validity and accuracy of a commercial linear encoder (Musclelab, Ergotest, Norway) to estimate Bench press 1 repetition maximum (1RM) from the force - velocity relationship. Twenty seven physical education students and teachers (5 women and 22 men) with a heterogeneous history of strength training participated in this study. They performed a 1 RM test and a force - velocity test using a Bench press lifting task in a random order. Mean 1 RM was 61.8 +/- 15.3 kg (range: 34 to 100 kg), while 1 RM estimated by the Musclelab's software from the force-velocity relationship was 56.4 +/- 14.0 kg (range: 33 to 91 kg). Actual and estimated 1 RM were very highly correlated (r = 0.93, p < 0.001) but largely different (Bias: 5.4 +/- 5.7 kg, p < 0.001, ES = 1.37). The 95% limits of agreement were +/- 11.2 kg, which represented +/- 18% of actual 1 RM. It was concluded that 1 RM estimated from the force-velocity relationship was a good measure for monitoring training induced adaptations, but also that it was not accurate enough to prescribe training intensities. Additional studies are required to determine whether accuracy is affected by age, sex or initial level.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 463
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Cross-sectional and longitudinal uses of isoinertial, isometric, and isokinetic dynamometry
    Abernethy, PJ
    Jurimae, J
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1996, 28 (09) : 1180 - 1187
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  • [3] FATIGUE AND RECOVERY OF VOLUNTARY AND ELECTRICALLY ELICITED DYNAMIC FORCE IN HUMANS
    BEELEN, A
    SARGEANT, AJ
    JONES, DA
    DERUITER, CJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1995, 484 (01): : 227 - 235
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] A DYNAMOMETER FOR EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC MUSCLE WORK
    BOSCO, C
    BELLI, A
    ASTRUA, M
    TIHANYI, J
    POZZO, R
    KELLIS, S
    TSARPELA, O
    FOTI, C
    MANNO, R
    TRANQUILLI, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 70 (05): : 379 - 386
  • [6] Earle R.W., 2008, Essentials of strength training and conditioning, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66120-2
  • [7] Hatfield DL, 2006, J STRENGTH COND RES, V20, P760
  • [8] Hoeger W.K., 1990, J SPORT SCI RES, V4, P47, DOI DOI 10.1519/00124278-199005000-00004
  • [9] USING THE LOAD-VELOCITY RELATIONSHIP FOR 1RM PREDICTION
    Jidovtseff, Boris
    Harris, Nigel K.
    Crielaard, Jean-Michel
    Cronin, John B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2011, 25 (01) : 267 - 270
  • [10] Logan P., 2000, Physiological Tests For Elite Athletes, P200