Endogeneity and Measurement Bias of the Indicator Variables in Hybrid Choice Models: A Monte Carlo Investigation

被引:18
作者
Budzinski, Wiktor [1 ]
Czajkowski, Mikolaj [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Econ Sci, Dluga 44-50, PL-00241 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Attitudinal variables; Endogeneity; Hybrid choice models; Indicator variables; Measurement error; ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES; BENEFIT TRANSFER; LATENT; PREFERENCES; QUALITY; POLICY; UNCERTAINTY; PERSONALITY; VALUATION; COASTAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-022-00702-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We investigate the problem of endogeneity and measurement bias arising from incorporating indicator variables (e.g., measures of attitudes) into discrete choice models. We demonstrate that although a hybrid choice framework can resolve both endogeneity and measurement problems, the former requires explicit accounting for in the model, which has not typically been done in applied studies to date. By conducting a Monte Carlo experiment, we demonstrate the extent of the bias resulting from measurement and endogeneity problems. We propose two novel solutions to address the endogeneity problem: explicitly accounting for correlation between structural and discrete choice component error terms (or with random parameters in a utility function), or introducing additional latent variables. Using simulated data, we demonstrate that these approaches work as expected, i.e. they successfully recover the true values of all model parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 629
页数:25
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Critical assessment of five methods to correct for endogeneity in discrete-choice models [J].
Angelo Guevara, C. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 82 :240-254
[2]   Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences [J].
Ariely, D ;
Loewenstein, G ;
Prelec, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (01) :73-105
[3]   Subjective vs. objective measures in the valuation of water quality [J].
Artell, Janne ;
Ahtiainen, Heini ;
Pouta, Eija .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 130 :288-296
[4]   About attitudes and perceptions: finding the proper way to consider latent variables in discrete choice models [J].
Bahamonde-Birke, Francisco J. ;
Kunert, Uwe ;
Link, Heike ;
de Dios Ortuzar, Juan .
TRANSPORTATION, 2017, 44 (03) :475-493
[5]   The impact of latent risk preferences on valuing the preservation of threatened lynx populations in Poland [J].
Bartczak, Anna ;
Mariel, Petr ;
Chilton, Susan ;
Meyerhoff, Juergen .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 60 (02) :284-306
[6]   Measuring heterogeneity, survey engagement and response quality in preferences for organic products in Nigeria [J].
Bello, Muhammad ;
Abdulai, Awudu .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2016, 48 (13) :1159-1171
[7]  
Ben-Akiva M., 2002, Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, DOI 10.1016/b978-008044044-6/50022-x
[8]   AUTOMOBILE PRICES IN MARKET EQUILIBRIUM [J].
BERRY, S ;
LEVINSOHN, J ;
PAKES, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1995, 63 (04) :841-890
[9]   Two Rules of Identification for Structural Equation Models [J].
Bollen, Kenneth A. ;
Davis, Walter R. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (03) :523-536
[10]   Personality and economic choices [J].
Boyce, Christopher ;
Czajkowski, Mikolaj ;
Hanley, Nick .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 94 :82-100