Why does eco-innovation differ in service firms? Some insights from Spain

被引:31
作者
Jove-Llopis, Elisenda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Segarra-Blasco, Agusti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Dept Econ, Res Grp Ind & Terr, CREIP, Reus, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Barcelona Inst Econ, Chair Energy Sustainabil, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
eco-innovation drivers; sustainable development; environmental policy; service firms; Spain; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; INITIAL CONDITIONS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; DETERMINANTS; DRIVERS; STRATEGIES; PATTERNS; MODELS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2407
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although environmental innovation studies have traditionally focused on manufacturing firms, the distinctive features of eco-innovation activities carried out by service firms require special attention. Using the Spanish Commumity Innovation Survey (CIS), this paper determines which are the main drivers of undertaking eco-innovation and investigates the similarities and differences between service and manufacturing firms within the five sub-groups of services (supplier dominated, scale intensive physical networks, scale intensive information networks, science-based, and others). The results confirm that the main eco-innovation triggers are similar-technological push factor orientation (internal R&D and persistence) and firm size-while the impact of market pull factors and public environmental legislation differ within the services sub-groups. In addition, we find a high degree of heterogeneity within service firms. In contrast to traditional service firms, those in the groups involving R&D activities, information networks, and scale-intensive physical networks exhibit intensive eco-innovation performance and show a high level of green indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:918 / 938
页数:21
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[2]  
[Anonymous], 89031 MERIT
[3]  
[Anonymous], Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank, COM(2018) 773 final
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Resource-efficient Green Economy and EU Policies, DOI DOI 10.2800/18514
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ENV INN GLOB MARK
[6]   Researching the Green Practices of Smaller Service Firms: A Theoretical, Methodological, and Empirical Assessment [J].
Aykol, Bilge ;
Leonidou, Leonidas C. .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 53 (04) :1264-1288
[7]   A SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE ON ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION BASED ON MAIN PATH ANALYSIS [J].
Barbieri, Nicolo ;
Ghisetti, Claudia ;
Gilli, Marianna ;
Marin, Giovanni ;
Nicolli, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2016, 30 (03) :596-623
[8]  
Bophavann C.O., 2024, Paving the Way for CrossBorder CBDC Payments
[9]   Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry [J].
Borghesi, Simone ;
Cainelli, Giulio ;
Mazzanti, Massimiliano .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) :669-683
[10]   The drivers for adoption of eco-innovation [J].
Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini ;
de Barcellos, Marcia Dutra ;
Vieira, Luciana Marques ;
Sauvee, Loic .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 :861-872