Chemical and non-chemical alternatives to methyl bromide fumigation of soil for strawberry production

被引:14
作者
López-Medina, J
López-Aranda, JM
Medina, JJ
Miranda, L
Flores, F
机构
[1] Univ Huelva, Dept Ciencias Agroforestales, Palos De La Frontera 21819, Huelva, Spain
[2] CIFA Las Torres, Consejeria Agr & Pesca Junta Andalucia, Moguer 21800, Huelva, Spain
[3] CIFA Malaga, Consejeria Agr & Pesca Junta Andalucia, Churriana 29140, Malaga, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14620316.2003.11511670
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Strawberries have been the target of research to find alternatives to methyl bromide (MB) as this crop is the largest single consumer of the chemical in Spain using 800 tonnes for fruit production and 237 tonnes in mother plant production. Electromagnetic waves (EW), Solarization (Sol), Biofumigation (Bio), Metham Sodium (MNa), Dazomet (Daz), 1,3-Dichloropropene (1,3-D) and Chloropicrin (Pic) were evaluated alone or in combination as alternatives for Methyl Bromide (MB) in strawberry production over a three-year period at two locations. The GGE biplot method was employed to study the MB alternative by environment two-way data. This method graphically displays MB alternative by environment data and hence facilitates the pattern of MB alternative performance across environments. 1,3-D plus 35% Pic (Telone C35), Pic alone, MB shank-applied to preformed beds under black polyethylene films and under black virtually impermeable films performed as well as the standard methyl bromide treatment and resulted in greatest total yield, early and total fruit weights. In addition, these treatments together with Daz and Sol plus MB resulted in greatest early yield.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 604
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], P INT C ALT METH BRO
  • [2] DONOHOE H, 2001, P 2001 ANN INT C MET
  • [3] DUERKSEN C, 1998, 1998 ANN INT C METH
  • [4] DUNIWAY JM, 2002, P INT C ALT METH BRO, P34
  • [5] DUNIWAY JM, 2001, P 2001 ANN INT C MET
  • [6] EGER JE, 2000, P 2000 ANN INT RES C
  • [7] A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G x E interaction
    Flores, F
    Moreno, MT
    Cubero, JI
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1998, 56 (03) : 271 - 286
  • [8] Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes
    Gauch, HG
    Zobel, RW
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (02) : 311 - 326
  • [9] HORNER I, 1999, P 1999 ANN INT RES C
  • [10] LARSON KD, 1998, P 1998 ANN INT C MET