Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures

被引:69
作者
Friedmann, N [1 ]
Shapiro, LP
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Educ, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] San Diego State Univ, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2003年 / 46卷 / 02期
关键词
agrammatism; comprehension; Hebrew; syntax; conduction aphasia;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2003/023)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This study examines agrammatic comprehension of object-subect-verb (OSV) and object-verb-subject (OVS) structures in Hebrew. These structures are syntactically identical to the basic order subject-verb-object (SVO) sentence except for the movement of the object to the beginning of the sentence, and thus enable empirical examination of syntactic movement in agrammatic comprehension., Seven individuals with agrammatism, 7 individuals with conduction aphasia, and 7 individuals without language impairment, all native speakers of Hebrew, performed a sentence-picture matching task. The task compared OSV and OVS sentences to SVO sentences and to subject and object relatives. Individuals with agrammatism performed more poorly than those in either of the other groups. Their comprehension of SVO sentences was significantly above chance, but comprehension of OSV and OVS sentences was at chance and was poorer than comprehension of SVO sentences. These results show that agrammatic comprehension of structures that involve movement of a noun phrase is impaired even when the structure is a simple active sentence, in line with the Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH; Y. Grodzinsky, 1990, 1995a, 2000). A modification is suggested to accommodate the TDH with the VP Internal Subject Hypothesis, according to which individuals with agrammatism use an "Avoid Movement" strategy in comprehension.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 297
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, LANG ACQUIS, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327817LA0303_2
  • [2] BAKER M, 1989, LINGUIST INQ, V20, P219
  • [3] Recruiting comparative crosslinguistic evidence to address competing accounts of agrammatic aphasia
    Beretta, A
    Piñango, M
    Patterson, J
    Harford, C
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 67 (03) : 149 - 168
  • [4] Biran M., 2002, ISRAELI J LANGUAGE S, V24, P21
  • [5] Does case make the difference? Agrammatic comprehension of case-inflected sentences in German
    Burchert, F
    De Bleser, R
    Sonntag, K
    [J]. CORTEX, 2001, 37 (05) : 700 - 702
  • [6] ASSIGNMENT OF THEMATIC ROLES TO NOUNS IN SENTENCE COMPREHENSION BY AN AGRAMMATIC PATIENT
    CAPLAN, D
    FUTTER, C
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1986, 27 (01) : 117 - 134
  • [7] SYNTACTIC DETERMINANTS OF SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN APHASIA
    CAPLAN, D
    BAKER, C
    DEHAUT, F
    [J]. COGNITION, 1985, 21 (02) : 117 - 175
  • [8] DISSOCIATION OF ALGORITHMIC AND HEURISTIC PROCESSES IN LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION - EVIDENCE FROM APHASIA
    CARAMAZZA, A
    ZURIF, EB
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1976, 3 (04) : 572 - 582
  • [9] Chomsky N., 1986, BARRIERS
  • [10] Cinque Guglielmo., 1990, TYPES ADEPENDENCIES