ASSESSMENT OF RISK TOLERANCE FOR ADVERSE EVENTS IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT CHEST PAIN PATIENTS: A PILOT STUDY

被引:17
|
作者
Brown, Todd B. [2 ]
Cofield, Stacey S. [1 ]
Iyer, Anand [1 ]
Lai, Robin [1 ]
Milteer, Hugh [1 ]
Queen, Brannon [1 ]
Schwab, Mark H. [1 ]
Menchine, Michael [3 ]
Schriger, David L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Emergency Med, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA
[2] Kern Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Bakersfield, CA USA
[3] UC Irvine Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Orange, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2010年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
chest pain; risk; risk tolerance; adverse event; death; myocardial infarction; emergency department; decision threshold; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ACUTE CARDIAC ISCHEMIA; MISSED DIAGNOSES; MULTICENTER; ROOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.03.026
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Emergency physicians commonly encounter low-probability/high-morbidity decisions, and chest pain is a prime example. Negative outcomes are improbable but feared, resulting in substantially more patients admitted for chest pain than have important disease. The literature gives little guidance on patient preferences for decision-making when the negative outcomes are unlikely but potentially severe. Objectives: The objective of this pilot study was to assess the tolerance of Emergency Department (ED) patients with chest pain for adverse events occurring within 2 weeks of the episode. Method: We recruited a convenience sample of patients with a chief complaint of chest pain from the ED of an urban tertiary-care referral center. Each subject was interviewed to determine demographic information, perceived health status, insurance status, and tolerance for adverse events related to chest pain. Adverse events were defined loosely but were suggested to be heart attack, the need for emergency cardiac surgery, or death. The risk tolerance question was framed by describing a specific numeric risk and determining at what risk the patient switched from desiring hospital admission to desiring discharge; we termed this the decision threshold. Results: Sixty-eight (68) subjects were included. Fifty-four percent of subjects were male, 60% were African-American, and 35% were white; 40% of the subjects classified themselves as being of average health. Of the 31 subjects who had prior heart trouble, 48% (n = 15) stated they had a prior heart attack and 19% (n = 6) an irregular heartbeat. The median decision threshold, or the acceptable personal risk of an adverse event for a person to forego admission to hospital, was 6.5% (interquartile range 0.5-22.9%). The mode was 0.5%, and 44% (30/68) of subjects had a decision threshold of 2% or less. There was no obvious pattern for most of these explanatory variables, though there was a suggestion that race may affect patients' risk tolerance. Conclusions: There is substantial variation in patients' reported tolerance for adverse events from ED chest pain. Further investigation of this phenomenon may lead to better decision-making. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 251
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring Patient Tolerance for Future Adverse Events in Low-Risk Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients
    Chen, Jennifer C.
    Cooper, Richelle J.
    Lopez-O'Sullivan, Ana
    Schriger, David L.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 64 (02) : 127 - 136
  • [2] ALARMED: Adverse events in low-risk patients with chest pain receiving continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in the Emergency Department. A pilot study
    Atzema, C
    Schull, MJ
    Borgundvaag, B
    Slaughter, GRD
    Lee, CK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 24 (01): : 62 - 67
  • [3] EARLY EXCLUSION OF MAJOR ADVERSE CARDIAC EVENTS IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT CHEST PAIN PATIENTS: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    Leung, Yuk-ki
    Cheng, Nga-man
    Chan, Cangel Pui-yee
    Lee, Anna
    Wong, Jeffrey Ka-tak
    Yan, Bryan Ping-yen
    Ahuja, Anil Tejbhan
    Graham, Colin Alexander
    Rainer, Timothy Hudson
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (03): : 287 - 294
  • [4] Communicating risk to emergency department patients with chest pain
    France, J.
    Keen, C.
    Bowyer, S.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2008, 25 (05) : 276 - 278
  • [5] Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: In patients presenting to the Emergency Department with chest pain is the use of the HEART score safe and effective in ruling out major adverse cardiac events (MACE)?
    Beirne, Swanick N.
    Neill, A.
    Eager, R.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 : S108 - S109
  • [6] Physican Sex Bias in Evaluating Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain: A Pilot Study
    Wilkie, L.
    Thode, Jr H. C.
    Singer, A. J.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 54 (03) : S134 - S134
  • [7] Predictive Factors and Risk Assessment for Hospitalization in Chest Pain Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department
    Kagansky, Nadya
    Mazor, David
    Wajdi, Ayashi
    Yaron, Yulia Maler
    Sharfman, Miya
    Baran, Tomer Ziv
    Kagansky, Dana
    Pachys, Gal
    Levy, Yochai
    Trotzky, Daniel
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (23)
  • [8] ALaRMED: adverse events in low-risk chest pain patients receiving continuous ECG monitoring in the emergency department: a survey of Canadian emergency physicians
    Atzema, Clare L.
    Schull, Michael J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 10 (05) : 413 - 419
  • [9] Improving Risk Stratification of Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department
    Altunoz, Yusuf
    Yilmaz, Banu Karakus
    Topcu, Hatice
    Cetinkal, Gokhan
    Ikizceli, Ibrahim
    Yigit, Yavuz
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [10] Evaluation of risk in patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department
    Heidenreich, PA
    Hlatky, MA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 106 (03): : 378 - 379