Can prophylactic C4/5 foraminotomy prevent C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty with and without posterior instrumented fusion with maximal expansion?

ObjectiveTo prospectively examine whether laminoplasty with maximal expansion induces C5 palsy, even with prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy.MethodsThirty-five consecutive patients with cervical myelopathy underwent laminoplasty (n=19: LP group) or posterior decompression and fusion (n=16: PDF group) with maximal expansion. Prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy was performed alternately in consecutive five patients undergoing each type of surgery. In each type of surgery, the first and third consecutive five patients did not undergo foraminotomy (NF subgroup: 20 patients), while the second and fourth consecutive five patients underwent foraminotomy (F subgroup: 15 patients). The widths between the gutters was equivalent to the diameter of the spinal canal, and an inclination angle of the lamina of approximately 90 degrees was created during laminoplasty. The incidence and severity of postoperative C5 palsy were investigated. Patients with a manual muscle testing score for the deltoid muscle and/or biceps brachii muscle of <= 2 were diagnosed with severe palsy.ResultsThe respective incidences of C5 palsy in the F and NF subgroups were 33% and 20% in the LP group and 50% and 20% in the PDF group. Severe palsy occurred in 67% and 0% of patients who had developed palsy in F and NF subgroups, respectively, in the LP group, and in 100% of patients in the PDF group. Furthermore, 40% of the patients with severe palsy took more than 6 months to recover.ConclusionsLaminoplasty with maximal expansion induced C5 palsy in both the LP and PDF groups, even with the addition of prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy.