Does the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer?

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Chen [1 ]
Li, Wenzhi [1 ]
Yin, Mingru [1 ]
Li, Menghui [1 ]
Wu, Ling [1 ]
Si, Jiqiang [1 ]
Zhao, Leiwen [1 ]
Li, Bin [1 ]
Yan, Zheng [1 ]
Lyu, Qifeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Assisted Reprod, Sch Med, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
0PN; Cell number; Blastocyst culture; Pregnancy outcomes; Neonatal outcomes; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; TIME-LAPSE; IVF; CULTURE; OOCYTES; ENDOMETRIOSIS; MORPHOLOGY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-022-04492-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background 0PN zygotes have a low cleavage rate, and the clinical outcomes of cleavage-stage embryo transfers are unsatisfactory. Blastocyst culturing is used to screen 0PN embryos, but whether the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affects the clinical outcomes following single blastocyst transfer is unknown and would be helpful in evaluating the clinical value of these embryos. Methods This retrospective study compared 46,804 0PN zygotes, 242 0PN frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfers, and 92 corresponding 0PN singletons with 232,441 2PN zygotes, 3563 2PN frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfers, and 1250 2PN singletons from January 2015 to October 2019 at a tertiary-care academic medical centre. The 0PN and 2PN embryos were divided into two groups: the group with < 6 cells on day 3 and that with >= 6 cells. Embryo development, subsequent pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results The cleavage and available blastocyst rates of the 0PN zygotes were much lower than those of the 2PN zygotes (25.9% vs. 97.4%, P < 0.001; 13.9% vs. 23.4%, P < 0.001). In the < 6 cells group, the available blastocyst rate of the cleaved 0PN embryos was significantly lower than that of the 2PN embryos (2.5% vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001). However, in the >= 6 cells group, the available blastocyst rate of the 0PN cleaved embryos significantly improved, although it was slightly lower than that of the 2PN embryos (33.9% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.014). Importantly, compared to those of the 2PN single blastocyst transfers, the clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, Z-score and malformation rate of the 0PN single blastocyst transfers were not significantly different in either the < 6 cells group (30.4% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.362; 30.4% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.932; 0.89 +/- 0.90 vs. 0.42 +/- 1.02, P = 0.161; 0% vs. 2.6%, P = 1.000) or the >= 6 cells group (50.7% vs. 46.6%, P = 0.246; 39.7% vs. 38.3%, P = 0.677; 0.50 +/- 1.23 vs. 0.47 +/- 1.11, P = 0.861; 2.4% vs. 1.8%, P = 1.000). Conclusions The cell number on day 3 of 0PN embryos affected the subsequent formation of blastocysts but did not influence the subsequent pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of 0PN single blastocyst transfers, which may be beneficial to clinicians counselling patients on the clinical value of 0PN embryos.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of pregnancy and live birth rates between fresh day 5 morula transfer and fresh day 6 blastocyst transfer following extended culture for slow growing embryos
    Firat Tulek
    Alper Kahraman
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 1273 - 1280
  • [32] Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts
    Ueno, Satoshi
    Uchiyama, Kazuo
    Kuroda, Tomoko
    Yabuuchi, Akiko
    Ezoe, Kenji
    Okimura, Tadashi
    Okuno, Takashi
    Kobayashi, Tamotsu
    Kato, Keiichi
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 36 (06) : 614 - 619
  • [33] Should we should consider day 3 blastomere number during single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycle? A retrospective study
    Zhou, Haisu
    Ye, Lianmin
    Zhang, Huan
    Zheng, Yi
    Jin, Wumin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 297 : 209 - 213
  • [34] Progesterone rise on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration impairs pregnancy outcome in day 3 single-embryo transfer, while has no effect on day 5 single blastocyst transfer
    Papanikolaou, Evangelos G.
    Kolibianakis, Efstratios M.
    Pozzobon, Cristina
    Tank, Parikshit
    Tournaye, Herman
    Bourgain, Claire
    Van Steirteghem, Andre
    Devroey, Paul
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (03) : 949 - 952
  • [35] Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following letrozole use in frozen-thawed single embryo transfer cycles
    Tatsumi, T.
    Jwa, S. C.
    Kuwahara, A.
    Irahara, M.
    Kubota, T.
    Saito, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (06) : 1244 - 1248
  • [36] Comparison of Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes of Single Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Between Letrozole-Induction and HRT Cycles in Patients With Abnormal Ovulation
    Zhang, Junwei
    Li, Zhen
    Sun, Lijun
    Guan, Yichun
    Du, Mingze
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [37] The recipient's Day after ovulation and the number of corpora lutea influence the likelihood of pregnancy in mares following transfer of ICSI frozen embryos
    Cuervo-Arango, Juan
    Claes, Anthony N.
    Stout, Tom A.
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2019, 135 : 181 - 188
  • [38] A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 and day 5/6 embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer really make a difference?
    Susan M. Maxwell
    Katherine Melzer-Ross
    David H. McCulloh
    James A. Grifo
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2015, 32 : 249 - 254
  • [39] Slightly Elevated Progesterone on HCG Trigger Day Has an Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes of Fresh Single Blastocyst Transfer Cycles Under an Early Follicular Phase Prolonged Protocol Cycle
    Wei, Longlon
    Zhao, Yan
    Xu, Chunyu
    Zhang, Cuilian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 14 : 1761 - 1768
  • [40] An increased trend in pregnancy rate following day 5 transfer of single embryos selected using Eeva Test compared with embryos selected using morphology alone
    Newby, H.
    Wheeler, R.
    Asgari, L.
    Schnauffer, K.
    Kingsland, C.
    Troup, S.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 229 - 229