Does the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer?

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Chen [1 ]
Li, Wenzhi [1 ]
Yin, Mingru [1 ]
Li, Menghui [1 ]
Wu, Ling [1 ]
Si, Jiqiang [1 ]
Zhao, Leiwen [1 ]
Li, Bin [1 ]
Yan, Zheng [1 ]
Lyu, Qifeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Dept Assisted Reprod, Sch Med, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
0PN; Cell number; Blastocyst culture; Pregnancy outcomes; Neonatal outcomes; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; TIME-LAPSE; IVF; CULTURE; OOCYTES; ENDOMETRIOSIS; MORPHOLOGY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-022-04492-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background 0PN zygotes have a low cleavage rate, and the clinical outcomes of cleavage-stage embryo transfers are unsatisfactory. Blastocyst culturing is used to screen 0PN embryos, but whether the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affects the clinical outcomes following single blastocyst transfer is unknown and would be helpful in evaluating the clinical value of these embryos. Methods This retrospective study compared 46,804 0PN zygotes, 242 0PN frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfers, and 92 corresponding 0PN singletons with 232,441 2PN zygotes, 3563 2PN frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfers, and 1250 2PN singletons from January 2015 to October 2019 at a tertiary-care academic medical centre. The 0PN and 2PN embryos were divided into two groups: the group with < 6 cells on day 3 and that with >= 6 cells. Embryo development, subsequent pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results The cleavage and available blastocyst rates of the 0PN zygotes were much lower than those of the 2PN zygotes (25.9% vs. 97.4%, P < 0.001; 13.9% vs. 23.4%, P < 0.001). In the < 6 cells group, the available blastocyst rate of the cleaved 0PN embryos was significantly lower than that of the 2PN embryos (2.5% vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001). However, in the >= 6 cells group, the available blastocyst rate of the 0PN cleaved embryos significantly improved, although it was slightly lower than that of the 2PN embryos (33.9% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.014). Importantly, compared to those of the 2PN single blastocyst transfers, the clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, Z-score and malformation rate of the 0PN single blastocyst transfers were not significantly different in either the < 6 cells group (30.4% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.362; 30.4% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.932; 0.89 +/- 0.90 vs. 0.42 +/- 1.02, P = 0.161; 0% vs. 2.6%, P = 1.000) or the >= 6 cells group (50.7% vs. 46.6%, P = 0.246; 39.7% vs. 38.3%, P = 0.677; 0.50 +/- 1.23 vs. 0.47 +/- 1.11, P = 0.861; 2.4% vs. 1.8%, P = 1.000). Conclusions The cell number on day 3 of 0PN embryos affected the subsequent formation of blastocysts but did not influence the subsequent pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of 0PN single blastocyst transfers, which may be beneficial to clinicians counselling patients on the clinical value of 0PN embryos.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer?
    Chen Chen
    Wenzhi Li
    Mingru Yin
    Menghui Li
    Ling Wu
    Jiqiang Si
    Leiwen Zhao
    Bin Li
    Zheng Yan
    Qifeng Lyu
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22
  • [2] The effect of the day 3 embryo cell number on the neonatal outcomes of day 5 single blastocyst transfer in frozen embryo transfer cycles
    Chen, Linjun
    Wang, Jie
    Zhua, Lihua
    Xua, Zhipeng
    Zhang, Ningyuan
    Lin, Fei
    Fang, Junshun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 283 : 81 - 85
  • [3] The effect of Day 3 cell number on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles
    Wu, Jiayi
    Zhang, Jie
    Kuang, Yanping
    Chen, Qiuju
    Wang, Yun
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (11) : 2478 - 2487
  • [4] Effect of day 3 embryo cell number on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of day 4 single embryo transfer from fresh cycles
    Tao, Lin-Lin
    Zheng, Bo
    Li, Guo-Zhen
    Geng, Ya-Song
    Guo, Yu-Ying
    Dai, Hao-Yang
    Wang, Shu-Song
    Dai, Fang-Fang
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] The impact of blastomere loss on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of vitrified-warmed Day3 embryos in single embryo transfer cycles
    Jiang, Shutian
    Jin, Wei
    Zhao, Xinxi
    Xi, Qianwen
    Chen, Li
    Gao, Yining
    Li, Wenzhi
    Kuang, Yanping
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [6] Successful pregnancy following the transfer of vitrified blastocyst which developed from poor quality embryos on day 3
    Zhang, Xiao-jian
    Yang, Ye-zhou
    Min, Li-hua
    Lv, Qun
    Bai, Pin
    Li, Xiao-jie
    Liao, Mei-xu
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 9 (03) : 203 - 208
  • [7] The influence of day 3 embryo cell number on the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of day 5 single blastocyst transfer from frozen embryo transfer cycles
    Wang, Jie
    Diao, Zhenyu
    Fang, Junshun
    Zhu, Lihua
    Xu, Zhipeng
    Lin, Fei
    Zhang, Ningyuan
    Chen, Linjun
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Individual culture leads to decreased blastocyst formation but does not affect pregnancy outcomes in the setting of a single, vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer
    Glatthorn, Haley N.
    Hanson, Brent M.
    Kim, Julia G.
    Herlihy, Nola S.
    Klimczak, Amber M.
    Hong, Kathleen H.
    Seli, Emre
    Scott, Richard T., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2021, 38 (08) : 2157 - 2164
  • [9] Storage duration of vitrified embryos does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfer
    Li, Xuelan
    Guo, Pingping
    Blockeel, Christophe
    Li, Xinning
    Deng, Ling
    Yang, Jie
    Li, Chujun
    Lin, Min
    Wu, Haocun
    Cai, Guifeng
    Hu, Yunzhao
    Chen, Xin
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [10] The impact of blastomere loss on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of vitrified-warmed Day3 embryos in single embryo transfer cycles
    Shutian Jiang
    Wei Jin
    Xinxi Zhao
    Qianwen Xi
    Li Chen
    Yining Gao
    Wenzhi Li
    Yanping Kuang
    Journal of Ovarian Research, 15