Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures

被引:334
作者
Krappinger, Dietmar [1 ]
Bizzotto, Nicola [1 ]
Riedmann, Stephan [1 ]
Kammerlander, Christian [1 ]
Hengg, Clemens [1 ]
Kralinger, Franz Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Innsbruck Med Univ, Dept Trauma Surg & Sports Med, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2011年 / 42卷 / 11期
关键词
Proximal humerus; Local BMD; Anatomic reduction; Medial cortical support; Implant failure; INTERNAL-FIXATION; PLATE; REDUCTION; IMPLANTS; SITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Several studies reported high failures rates after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Loss of reduction and screw cut-out are the most common reasons for revision surgery. Several risk factors for failure have been described in the literature. The aim of the present study was to assess risk factors for failure after surgical fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures in a multivariate setup. Methods: Two different surgical techniques (PHILOS locking plate and Humerusblock) were used. In the PHILOS group, every kind of postoperative relative movement between the implant and the humeral head or shaft was defined as failure. In the Humerusblock group, postoperative movement between the humeral head and the shaft in terms of angulation or translational displacement was defined as failure. The following parameters were assessed: age, gender, cancellous bone mineral density (BMD) of the humeral head, fracture type, medial metaphyseal comminution, medial metaphyseal head extension, initial angulation of the humeral head in the frontal plane, initial anteversion of the humeral head, medial hinge displacement, maximum displacement of the tuberosities with respect to the head, surgical technique, anatomic reconstruction and restoration of the medial cortical support. Results: The following parameters were found to have a significant influence on the failure rate: age, local BMD, anatomic reduction, and restoration of the medial cortical support. The failure rate significantly increased with the number of risk factors. Conclusion: Preoperative assessment of the local BMD and the patients' biological age as well as intraoperative anatomic reduction and restoration of the medial cortical support are the essentials for successful surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Multifragmentary fracture patterns in old patients with low local BMD are prone for fixation failure. If the surgeon is not able to achieve anatomic reduction and restoration of the medial cortical support intraoperatively in this situation, adjustments such as augmentation or primary arthroplasty should be considered. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1288
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates
    Agudelo, Juan
    Schuermann, Matthias
    Stahel, Philip
    Helwig, Peter
    Morgan, Steven J.
    Zechel, Wolfgang
    Bahrs, Christian
    Parekh, Anand
    Ziran, Bruce
    Williams, Allison
    Smith, Wade
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2007, 21 (10) : 676 - 681
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V23, P113, DOI 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819344bf
  • [3] Percutaneous osteosynthesis of humeral head fractures
    Resch H.
    Hübner C.
    Aschauer E.
    [J]. Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2007, 19 (3) : 276 - 293
  • [4] BENGNER U, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P179
  • [5] Minimally-invasive treatment of three-and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients
    Bogner, R.
    Huebner, C.
    Matis, N.
    Auffarth, A.
    Lederer, S.
    Resch, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (12): : 1602 - 1607
  • [6] Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Proximal Humerus Fractures Using a Proximal Humeral Locked Plate: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis
    Brunner, Felix
    Sommer, Christoph
    Bahrs, Christian
    Hettwinkel, Rainer
    Hafner, Christian
    Rillmann, Paavo
    Kohut, Georges
    Ekelund, Anders
    Muller, Mathias
    Audige, Laurent
    Babst, Reto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2009, 23 (03) : 163 - 172
  • [7] Pitfalls and complications with locking plate for proximal humerus fracture
    Clavert, Philippe
    Adam, Philippe
    Bevort, Adrien
    Bonnomet, Francois
    Kempf, Jean-Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 19 (04) : 489 - 494
  • [8] Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review
    Court-Brown, Charles M.
    Caesar, Ben
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2006, 37 (08): : 691 - 697
  • [9] Assessment of bone quality in the proximal humerus by measurement of the contralateral site: a cadaveric analyze
    Diederichs, G
    Korner, J
    Goldhahn, J
    Linke, B
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2006, 126 (02) : 93 - 100
  • [10] Bone mineral density measurement over the shoulder region
    Doetsch, AM
    Faber, J
    Lynnerup, N
    Wätjen, I
    Bliddal, H
    Danneskiold-Samsoe, B
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 71 (04) : 308 - 314