Retention of enrollees following a cancer diagnosis within health maintenance organizations in the Cancer Research Network

被引:20
作者
Field, TS
Cernieux, J
Buist, D
Geiger, A
Lamerato, L
Hart, G
Bachman, D
Krajenta, R
Greene, S
Hornbrook, MC
Ansell, G
Herrinton, L
Reed, G
机构
[1] Fallon Healthcare Syst, Meyers Primary Care Inst, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[3] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[4] So Calif Permanente Med Grp, Dept Res & Evaluat, Pasadena, CA USA
[5] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente, Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR USA
[7] Kaiser Permanente, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djh010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Population laboratories with complete clinical information on episodes of care are needed to support research on the quality of care delivered to cancer patients. Data resources within the Cancer Research Network (CRN) may overcome many of the limitations of existing cancer databases, but their potential clinical value depends on the stability of the enrolled population. To assess this issue, we studied the retention rates among survivors of the 132 580 patients diagnosed with cancer from January 1, 1993, through December 31, 1998, who were enrolled at five health maintenance organization sites participating in the CRN. Enrollees were followed from cancer diagnosis through death, disenrollment, or the end of follow-up (i.e., December 31, 1999). The retention rate among survivors for all cancers combined at 1 and 5 years after cancer diagnosis was 96.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 95.9% to 96.1%) and 83.9% (95% CI = 83.4% to 84.3%), respectively. The proportion of enrollees diagnosed with cancer who remained enrolled and available for evaluation suggests that the CRN is well-suited for studies of the quality of care for cancer patients, survivorship, and long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 152
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
*AM COLL SURG, 2002, NATL CANC DAT BAS NC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Enhancing Data Systems to Improve the Quality of Care
[3]   Determining the quality of breast cancer care: Do tumor registries measure up? [J].
Bickell, NA ;
Chassin, MR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 132 (09) :705-+
[4]  
*DHHS, 2003, NAT PROGR CANC REG 2
[5]  
GRAMBSCH PM, 1994, BIOMETRIKA, V81, P515
[6]  
Hankey BF, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P1117
[7]  
HEWITT M, 1999, ENSURING QUALITY CAR, P2
[8]   Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care [J].
Malin, JL ;
Kahn, KL ;
Adams, J ;
Kwan, L ;
Laouri, M ;
Ganz, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2002, 94 (11) :835-844
[9]  
Menck HR, 1997, CANCER, V80, P2296, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971215)80:12<2296::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-P