Implications of EMF 34 scenarios on renewable deployment and carbon abatement in Canada: Insights from a regionalized energy model

被引:8
作者
Bahn, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Vaillancourt, Kathleen [3 ]
机构
[1] HEC Montreal, Gerad, 3000 Chemin Cote Ste Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
[2] HEC Montreal, Dept Decis Sci, 3000 Chemin Cote Ste Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
[3] ESMIA Consultants, Blainville, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Low-carbon energy system; Renewable electricity; Climate change mitigation; TIMES optimization Model; Prospective analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111518
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a detailed analysis of the evolution of Canadian energy systems under some selected EMF (Energy Modeling Forum) 34 scenarios. Our analysis is based on NATEM, an energy model that follows the TIMES approach of the International Energy Agency to represent in detail the energy sector of each of the 13 Canadian provinces and territories. NATEM shows that imposing different renewable penetration constraints for electricity generation has limited impacts outside the electricity sector. In particular, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions continue to increase over time. Conversely, the imposition of a carbon tax has broader impacts on Canadian energy systems and on GHG emissions that are almost stabilized. However, the level of the carbon tax envisions by the EMF 34 study (increasing to a maximum level of $130 per tonne by 2050) is not high enough, in a Canadian context, to trigger a decrease of GHG emissions over time as mandated by Canadian climate policies.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PAN CAN FRAM CLEAN G
[2]  
[Anonymous], National Inventory Report 1990-2015: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks: Executive Summary
[3]   Multi-regional evaluation of the US electricity sector under technology and policy uncertainties: Findings from MARKAL EPA9rUS modeling [J].
Balash, Peter ;
Nichols, Christopher ;
Victor, Nadejda .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2013, 47 (02) :89-119
[4]   GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems [J].
Calvin, Katherine ;
Patel, Pralit ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Asrar, Ghassem ;
Bond-Lamberty, Ben ;
Cui, Ryna Yiyun ;
Di Vittorio, Alan ;
Dorheim, Kalyn ;
Edmonds, Jae ;
Hartin, Corinne ;
Hejazi, Mohamad ;
Horowitz, Russell ;
Iyer, Gokul ;
Kyle, Page ;
Kim, Sonny ;
Link, Robert ;
McJeon, Haewon ;
Smith, Steven J. ;
Snyder, Abigail ;
Waldhoff, Stephanie ;
Wise, Marshall .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (02) :677-698
[5]  
CanSIA-Canadian Solar Industries Association, 2016, FIT MFIT 2017 PRIC R
[6]  
Cohen StuartM., 2019, Regional energy deployment system (reeds) model documentation: Version 2018
[7]  
Electric Power Research Institute, 2020, US REGEN MOD DOC
[8]  
Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2016, CAN MIDC LONG TERM L, P87
[9]   North American natural gas model: Impact of cross-border trade with Mexico [J].
Feijoo, Felipe ;
Huppmann, Daniel ;
Sakiyama, Larissa ;
Siddiqui, Sauleh .
ENERGY, 2016, 112 :1084-1095
[10]  
Fu R., 2017, U.S. Solar Photovoltaic System Cost Benchmark : Q1 2017