Factors related to longitudinal adherence in colorectal cancer screening: qualitative research findings

被引:16
作者
Benito, Llucia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Farre, Albert [4 ]
Binefa, Gemma [1 ,2 ]
Vidal, Carmen [1 ,2 ]
Cardona, Angels [5 ]
Pla, Margarita [6 ]
Garcia, Montse [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Catalan Inst Oncol, Canc Prevent & Control Program, Av Gran Via 199-203, Lhospitalet De Llobregat 08908, Barcelona, Spain
[2] IDIBELL, Inst Biomed Res, Av Gran Via 199-203, Lhospitalet De Llobregat 08908, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Sch Nursing, Fundamental Care & Med Surg Nursing Dept, C Feixa Llarga S-N,Campus Bellvitge, Lhospitalet De Llobregat 08907, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[5] AreaQ Evaluat & Qualitat Res SL, Domenech 7, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Barcelona, Sch Nursing, Publ Hlth Mental Hlth & Perinatal Nursing Dept, C Feixa Llarga S-N,Campus Bellvitge, Lhospitalet De Llobregat 08907, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Participation; Mass screening; Longitudinal adherence; Barriers; Qualitative study; OCCULT BLOOD-TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; 4; ROUNDS; PROGRAM; PARTICIPATION; BARRIERS; FACILITATORS; MAMMOGRAPHY; INVITATION; CATALONIA;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-017-0982-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The effectiveness of screening in colorectal cancer prevention depends on sustained participation rates. The objective of this study was to explore factors related to the longitudinal adherence of screening behavior in the context of a biennial population-based cancer screening program. Methods Eight focus groups were conducted with individuals who were invited two or three consecutive times to a population-based colorectal cancer screening program using a fecal occult blood test and who agreed to participate in the program at least once (n = 45). The criteria used to select the study members included adherence to fecal occult blood test maintenance, factors regarding their initial participation in the colorectal cancer screening, sex, and contextual educational level. Results The participants expressed a high level of satisfaction with the program; however, they showed a low level of understanding with respect to cancer screening. Consulting a general practitioner was cited by all participants as an important factor that mediated their final decision or influenced their behavior as a whole with regard to the program. Fear played a different role in the screening behavior for regular and irregular adherent participants. In the adherent participants, fear facilitated their continued participation in the screening program, whereas for the irregular participants, fear led them to avoid or refuse further screening. Having a close person diagnosed with colorectal cancer was a facilitator for the regular adherent participants. The irregular adherent participants showed some relaxation with respect to screening after a negative result and considered that further screening was no longer necessary. Conclusion Considering the importance of primary healthcare professionals in the decision regarding sustained participation, it is important to better engage them with cancer screening programs, as well as improve the communication channels to provide accurate and balanced information for both health professionals and individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 114
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Barriers and facilitators to providing common preventive screening services in managed care settings [J].
Amonkar, MM ;
Madhavan, S ;
Rosenbluth, SA ;
Simon, KJ .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 24 (03) :229-247
[2]   Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial [J].
Atkin, Wendy S. ;
Edwards, Rob ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Hart, Andrew R. ;
Northover, John M. A. ;
Parkin, D. Max ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Cuzick, Jack .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726) :1624-1633
[3]   Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: Qualitative research findings and implications for intervention [J].
Beeker, C ;
Kraft, JM ;
Southwell, BG ;
Jorgensen, CM .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 25 (03) :263-278
[4]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[5]   Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Stock, Christian ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
[6]   Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer Up to 10 Years After Screening, Surveillance, or Diagnostic Colonoscopy [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Jansen, Lina ;
Knebel, Phillip ;
Stock, Christian ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (03) :709-717
[7]  
Bridou M, 2013, HEALTH PSYCHOL RES, V1, P111, DOI [10.4082/hpr.2013.e22, 10.4081/hpr.2013.e22]
[8]   Reattendance in the Swiss mammography screening pilot programme [J].
Bulliard, JL ;
De Landtsheer, JP ;
Levi, F .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2004, 11 (02) :59-64
[9]   Organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: how to optimize efficiency in the general population [J].
Calazel-Benque, Anne ;
Viguier, Jerome ;
Roussel, Claire ;
Pivot, Xavier ;
Eisinger, Francois ;
Blay, Jean-Yves ;
Coscas, Yvan ;
Morere, Jean-Francois .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2011, 20 :S20-S25
[10]   Underutilizers of mammography screening today: Characteristics of women planning, undecided about, and not planning a mammogram [J].
Clemow, L ;
Costanza, ME ;
Haddad, WP ;
Luckmann, R ;
White, MJ ;
Klaus, D ;
Stoddard, AM .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2000, 22 (01) :80-88