Three epigenetic information channels and their different roles in evolution

被引:109
作者
Shea, N. [2 ,3 ]
Pen, I. [4 ]
Uller, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Edward Grey Inst, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Fac Philosophy, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Somerville Coll, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
[4] Univ Groningen, Theoret Biol Grp, Groningen, Netherlands
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
epigenetic inheritance; inherited information; maternal effects; nongenetic inheritance; transgenerational plasticity; DNA METHYLATION; TRANSGENERATIONAL PLASTICITY; DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY; CHROMATIN DIMINUTION; INHERITANCE; MEMORY; PLANT; ADAPTATION; MECHANISMS; GENOME;
D O I
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02235.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
There is increasing evidence for epigenetically mediated transgenerational inheritance across taxa. However, the evolutionary implications of such alternative mechanisms of inheritance remain unclear. Herein, we show that epigenetic mechanisms can serve two fundamentally different functions in transgenerational inheritance: (i) selection-based effects, which carry adaptive information in virtue of selection over many generations of reliable transmission; and (ii) detection-based effects, which are a transgenerational form of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. The two functions interact differently with a third form of epigenetic information transmission, namely information about cell state transmitted for somatic cell heredity in multicellular organisms. Selection-based epigenetic information is more likely to conflict with somatic cell inheritance than is detection-based epigenetic information. Consequently, the evolutionary implications of epigenetic mechanisms are different for unicellular and multicellular organisms, which underscores the conceptual and empirical importance of distinguishing between these two different forms of transgenerational epigenetic effect.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1187
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]  
Helantera H., 2010, Philosophy Theory in Biology, V2, pe101, DOI DOI 10.3998/PTB.6959004.0002.001)
[22]   Epigenetic inheritance in plants [J].
Henderson, Ian R. ;
Jacobsen, Steven E. .
NATURE, 2007, 447 (7143) :418-424
[23]   The adaptive advantage of phenotypic memory in changing environments [J].
Jablonka, E ;
Oborny, B ;
Molnar, I ;
Kisdi, E ;
Hofbauer, J ;
Czaran, T .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 350 (1332) :133-141
[24]  
Jablonka E., 1995, EPIGENETIC INHERITAN
[25]  
Jablonka E., 2005, EVOLUTION 4 DIMENSIO
[26]   TRANSGENERATIONAL EPIGENETIC INHERITANCE: PREVALENCE, MECHANISMS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF HEREDITY AND EVOLUTION [J].
Jablonka, Eva ;
Raz, Gal .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2009, 84 (02) :131-176
[27]   OPINION Epigenome dynamics: a quantitative genetics perspective [J].
Johannes, Frank ;
Colot, Vincent ;
Jansen, Ritsert C. .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2008, 9 (11) :883-890
[28]   Assessing the Impact of Transgenerational Epigenetic Variation on Complex Traits [J].
Johannes, Frank ;
Porcher, Emmanuelle ;
Teixeira, Felipe K. ;
Saliba-Colombani, Vera ;
Simon, Matthieu ;
Agier, Nicolas ;
Bulski, Agnes ;
Albuisson, Juliette ;
Heredia, Fabiana ;
Audigier, Pascal ;
Bouchez, David ;
Dillmann, Christine ;
Guerche, Philippe ;
Hospital, Frederic ;
Colot, Vincent .
PLOS GENETICS, 2009, 5 (06)
[29]  
KIRKPATRICK M, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P485, DOI [10.2307/2409054, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04247.x]
[30]   The inheritance of phenotypes: An adaptation to fluctuating environments [J].
Lachmann, M ;
Jablonka, E .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 181 (01) :1-9