Comprehensive evaluation system for optimal configuration of multi-energy systems

被引:10
作者
Li, Ji [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Wei [2 ]
Feng, Xiaomei [2 ]
Lu, Hai [3 ]
Qiao, Biao [2 ]
Gu, Wei [4 ]
Zhang, Guangqiu [2 ]
Jiao, Yuting [5 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Jinan 250000, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Bldg Res, Beijing 100013, Peoples R China
[3] Elect Power Test & Res Inst, Yunnan Power Grid, Kunming 650217, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[4] Southeast Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[5] Qingdao Ctr Bldg Energy Conservat & Ind Dev, Qingdao 266061, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Multi-energy system; Evaluation system; Configuration optimization; Analytic hierarchy process; Monte Carlo simulation; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; RISK ANALYSIS; ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; BUILDINGS; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111367
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
As a feasible method of energy transformation, a multi-energy system (MES) realizes coordinated development and optimized operation of different energy systems, and effectively improves the utilization rate of renewable energy in the energy system. However, the optimal configuration between different energy systems has become a critical obstacle hindering the development of MES. Based on an actual engineering project, this study established a comprehensive evaluation index system for a MES, including a tri-genera tion + ground source heat pump (GSHP) + energy storage system (ESS) + gas boiler system (GBS). Then, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Monte Carlo simulation were used to analyze the weights and sensitivities of various indices, and the different results obtained by the two methods were compared. Under different optimization objectives, the optimized configuration of MES is further obtained, and the following conclusions are drawn. (1) A comprehensive energy evaluation system considering the system's cost, economic operation, and environmental impact was established in this study. (2) The AHP and Monte Carlo simulation methods were used to analyze the weight and calculate the sensitivity of the proposed evaluation indices. (3) The results of the index weights obtained using the two different methods were compared and the error was within 15%. (4) A sufficient amount of data samples and the relevant sensitivity weight results can be obtained relatively objectively and fairly using the Monte Carlo simulation method as presented herein. The proposed comprehensive evaluation system can provide important guidance to future research in this field. CO 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Development of an energy efficiency rating system for existing buildings using Analytic Hierarchy Process - The case of Egypt
    AbdelAzim, Ahmed Ibrahim
    Ibrahim, Ahmed Mohamed
    Aboul-Zahab, Essam Mohamed
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 71 : 414 - 425
  • [2] Growth impact of transition from non-renewable to renewable energy in the EU: The role of research and development expenditure
    Adedoyin, Festus Fatai
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 159 : 1139 - 1145
  • [3] Performance analysis of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision support models for contractor selection
    Afolayan, Abimbola H.
    Ojokoh, Bolanle A.
    Adetunmbi, Adebayo O.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2020, 9
  • [4] Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia
    Ahmad, Salman
    Tahar, Razman Mat
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 63 : 458 - 466
  • [5] Cabala P, 2010, OPER RES DECIS, V20, P5
  • [6] Cao Y W, 2020, Glob Energy Interconnect, V3, P430, DOI [10.1016/j.gloei.2020.11.003, DOI 10.1016/J.GLOEI.2020.11.003]
  • [7] Energy flow optimization method for multi-energy system oriented to combined cooling, heating and power
    Chen Lingmin
    Wu Jiekang
    Wu Fan
    Tang Huiling
    Li Changjie
    Xiong Yan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 211
  • [8] Chuansheng X., 2012, SYSTEMS ENG PROCEDIA, V4, P203, DOI [10.1016/j.sepro.2011.11.067, DOI 10.1016/J.SEPRO.2011.11.067]
  • [9] Cicek A., 2020, ENERGY, V208
  • [10] Forecasting and assessment of the 2030 australian electricity mix paths towards energy transition
    De Rosa, Luca
    Castro, Rui
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 205 (205)