Environmental impacts and resource use of urban agriculture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:60
作者
Dorr, Erica [1 ,2 ]
Goldstein, Benjamin [3 ]
Horvath, Arpad [4 ]
Aubry, Christine [1 ]
Gabrielle, Benoit [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, INRAE, Agroparistech, UMR SAD APT, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris Saclay, INRAE, Agroparistech, UMR ECOSYS, Thierval Grignon, France
[3] McGill Univ, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
urban agriculture; life cycle assessment; systematic review; environmental impacts; resource use; sustainable food systems; sustainable agriculture; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; FOOD SYSTEMS; ROOFTOP GREENHOUSE; COMMUNITY GARDENS; SUSTAINABILITY; PRODUCTS; LCA; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ac1a39
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental merits are a common motivation for many urban agriculture (UA) projects. One powerful way of quantifying environmental impacts is with life cycle assessment (LCA): a method that estimates the environmental impacts of producing, using, and disposing of a good. LCAs of UA have proliferated in recent years, evaluating a diverse range of UA systems and generating mixed conclusions about their environmental performance. To clarify the varied literature, we performed a systematic review of LCAs of UA to answer the following questions: What is the scope of available LCAs of UA (geographic, crop choice, system type)? What is the environmental performance and resource intensity of diverse forms of UA? How have these LCAs been done, and does the quality and consistency allow the evidence to support decision making? We searched for original, peer-reviewed LCAs of agricultural production at UA systems, and selected and evaluated 47 papers fitting our analysis criteria, covering 88 different farms and 259 production systems. Focusing on yield, water consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and cumulative energy demand, using functional units based on mass of crops grown and land occupied, we found a wide range of results. We summarized baseline ranges, identified trends across UA profiles, and highlighted the most impactful parts of different systems. There were examples of all types of systems-across physical set up, crop type, and socio-economic orientation-achieving low and high impacts and yields, and performing better or worse than conventional agriculture. However, issues with the quality and consistency of the LCAs, the use of conventional agriculture data in UA settings, and the high variability in their results prevented us from drawing definitive conclusions about the environmental impacts and resource use of UA. We provided guidelines for improving LCAs of UA, and make a strong case that more research on this topic is necessary to improve our understanding of the environmental impacts and benefits of UA.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Identifying hotspots in the carbon footprint of a small scale organic vegetable farm [J].
Adewale, Cornelius ;
Higgins, Stewart ;
Granatstein, David ;
Stoeckle, Claudio O. ;
Carlson, Bryan R. ;
Zaher, Usama E. ;
Carpenter-Boggs, Lynne .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 149 :112-121
[2]   Towards sustainable urban food systems: Analyzing contextual and intrapsychic drivers of growing food in small-scale urban agriculture [J].
Alemu, Mohammed Hussen ;
Grebitus, Carola .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12)
[3]   LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) OF FOOD-PRODUCTS AND PRODUCTION SYSTEMS [J].
ANDERSSON, K ;
OHLSSON, T ;
OLSSON, P .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 5 (05) :134-138
[4]  
[Anonymous], 140402006 ISO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Crops
[6]  
Appolloni E., 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V296, DOI [10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126556, DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.126556]
[7]   Assessing the environmental behavior of alternative fertigation methods in soilless systems: The case of Phaseolus vulgaris with struvite and rhizobia inoculation [J].
Arcas-Pilz, Veronica ;
Rufi-Salis, Marti ;
Parada, Felipe ;
Gabarrell, Xavier ;
Villalba, Gara .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 770
[8]   The Role of Urban Agriculture as a Nature-Based Solution: A Review for Developing a Systemic Assessment Framework [J].
Artmann, Martina ;
Sartison, Katharina .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06)
[9]  
Audsley A., 1997, AIR3CT942028
[10]   Potential mitigation of the environmental impacts of food systems through urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA) - a life cycle assessment approach [J].
Benis, Khadija ;
Ferrao, Paulo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 :784-795