A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term

被引:53
作者
Burgos, Jorge [1 ,3 ]
Carlos Melchor, Juan [1 ,3 ]
Ignacio Pijoan, Jose [2 ]
Cobos, Patricia [1 ]
Fernandez-Llebrez, Luis [1 ]
Martinez-Astorquiza, Txanton [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cruces Univ Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Serv, Vizcaya, Spain
[2] Cruces Univ Hosp, Clin Res Unit, Vizcaya, Spain
[3] Univ Basque Country, Sch Med, Vizcaya, Spain
关键词
Amniotic fluid; Breech presentation; External cephalic version; Parity; Placental location; Pregnancy outcome; PREVIOUS CESAREAN DELIVERY; WOMEN; PREDICTORS; TOCOLYSIS; ULTRASOUND; EFFICACY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.023
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation at term. Methods: A prospective analysis of 500 ECV maneuvers. The variables maternal age, maternal weight, body mass index, previous cesarean delivery, gestational age, parity, amount of amniotic fluid, placental location, and type of breech were studied using logistic regression analysis. Results: The success rate of ECV was 52.2% (n=261). The variables significantly associated with success were parity, placental location, amount of amniotic fluid, and type of breech (P<0.05). A parity of 2 had a 3.74-times higher probability of success than nulliparity (95% CI, 2.37-5.90); a posterior placenta increased the success rate by 2.85 times compared with an anterior placenta (95% CI, 1.87-4.36); and double footling breech presentation had a 2.77-times higher success rate compared with a frank breech presentation (95% CI, 1.16-6.62). The area under the ROC curve showed a predictive ability of 73.6% (95% CI, 69.2%-77.9%) for these 3 variables. Conclusion: Parity, placental location, amount of amniotic fluid, and type of breech presentation were associated with the success rate of ECV. (C) 2010 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 51
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature
    Abenhaim, Haim A.
    Varin, Jocelyne
    Boucher, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (02) : 156 - 160
  • [2] External cephalic version: Predictors of success
    Aisenbrey, GA
    Catanzarite, VA
    Nelson, C
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (05) : 783 - 786
  • [3] Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version
    Ben-Meir, Assaf
    Erez, Yair
    Sela, Hen Yitzhak
    Shveiky, David
    Tsafrir, Avi
    Ezra, Yossef
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 21 (09) : 660 - 662
  • [4] The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: A 3-year cumulative experience
    BenArie, A
    Kogan, S
    Schachter, M
    Hagay, ZJ
    Insler, V
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1995, 63 (02): : 125 - 129
  • [5] Does fetal weight estimated by ultrasound really affect the success rate of external cephalic version?
    Burgos, Jorge
    Carlos Melchor, Juan
    Cobos, Patricia
    Centeno, Marimar
    Ignacio Pijoan, Jose
    Fernandez-Llebrez, Luis
    Martinez-Astorquiza, Txanton
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2009, 88 (10) : 1101 - 1106
  • [6] Significance of success rate of external cephalic versions and vaginal breech deliveries in counseling women with breech presentation at term
    Ezra, Y
    Elram, T
    Plotkin, V
    Elchalal, U
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2000, 90 (01): : 63 - 66
  • [7] FERGUSON JE, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V70, P722
  • [8] Flock F, 1998, Zentralbl Gynakol, V120, P60
  • [9] FORTUNATO SJ, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V72, P59
  • [10] Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial
    Hannah, ME
    Hannah, WJ
    Hewson, SA
    Hodnett, ED
    Saigal, S
    Willan, AR
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) : 1375 - 1383