A clinical evaluation of the Image Quality computer program, CoCIQ

被引:9
作者
Norrman, E [1 ]
Gårdestig, M
Persliden, J
Geijer, H
机构
[1] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, S-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Univ Orebro, Dept Nat Sci, S-70182 Orebro, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, IMV, Dept Radiat Phys, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, S-70185 Orebro, Sweden
关键词
CDRAD phantom; image quality; computed calculated image quality figure; contrast-detail curves;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-004-1036-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To provide an objective way of measuring image quality, a computer program was designed that automatically analyzes the test images of a contrast-detail (CD) phantom. The program gives a quantified measurement of image quality by calculating an Image Quality Figure (IQF). The aim of this work was to evaluate the program and adjust it to clinical situations in order to find the detectable level where the program gives a reliable figure of the contrast resolution. The program was applied on a large variety of images with lumbar spine and urographic parameters, from very low to very high image qualities. It was shown that the computer program produces IQFs with small variations and there were a strong linear statistical relation between the computerized evaluation and the evaluation performed by human observers (R-2 = 0.98). This method offers a fast and easy way of conducting image quality evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 144
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Image quality vs radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study [J].
Geijer, H ;
Beckman, KW ;
Andersson, T ;
Persliden, J .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (09) :1704-1709
[2]  
GEIJER H, 2004, 2 MALM C MED XRAY IM, P23
[3]   Computer aided assessment of image quality for mammography using a contrast detail phantom [J].
Jansen, JTM ;
Zoetelief, J .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2000, 90 (1-2) :181-184
[4]   EFFECTS OF OPTIMIZATION AND IMAGE-PROCESSING IN DIGITAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY - AN ROC STUDY WITH AN ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOM [J].
KHEDDACHE, S ;
MANSSON, LG ;
ANGELHED, JE ;
DENBRATT, L ;
GOTTFRIDSSON, B ;
SCHLOSSMAN, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 13 (02) :143-150
[5]   TOWARD CONSENSUS ON QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF MEDICAL IMAGING-SYSTEMS [J].
METZ, CE ;
WAGNER, RF ;
DOI, K ;
BROWN, DG ;
NISHIKAWA, RM ;
MYERS, KJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (07) :1057-1061
[6]  
NORRMAN E, 2004, 21 M SOC COMP APPL R
[7]   Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems - A contrast-detail phantom study [J].
Rong, XJJ ;
Shaw, CC ;
Liu, XM ;
Lemacks, MR ;
Thompson, SK .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (11) :2328-2335
[8]   Objective assessment of phantom image quality in mammography: a feasibility study [J].
Smith, ADC ;
Smith, IAC ;
Dance, DR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (841) :48-58
[9]   Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography [J].
Sund, P ;
Båth, M ;
Kheddache, S ;
Månsson, LG .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) :48-58
[10]  
Thijssen M, 1998, MANUAL CDRAD PHANTOM