Evaluation of the Impact and Implementation of Social Prescribing in Primary Healthcare Units in Lisbon: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol

被引:10
作者
Hoffmeister, Louise Viecili [1 ,2 ]
Nunes, Mariana Fortuna [1 ]
Marta Figueiredo, Cristiano Emanuel [1 ,3 ]
Coelho, Andreia [3 ]
Fraga Oliveira, Mariana Filipa [3 ]
Massano, Paula [3 ]
Gama, Ana [1 ,2 ]
Aguiar, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
Dias, Sonia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, Publ Hlth Res Ctr, Natl Sch Publ Hlth, Ave Padre Cruz, P-1600560 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Comprehens Hlth Res Ctr CHRC, Campo Martires Patria 130, P-130116905 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Cent Lisbon Hlth Ctr Cluster, Rua Carvalho Araujo 103, P-103190018 Lisbon, Portugal
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE | 2021年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
social prescribing; complex interventions; integrated care; health promotion; study protocol; public health; DETERMINANTS; VOLUNTARY;
D O I
10.5334/ijic.5592
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Social Prescribing (SP) is an intervention to link users of the primary healthcare services to non-clinical organizations based on the community to tackle social determinants of health. Despite the potential benefits of SP, the effectiveness of this complex intervention remains uncertain. This paper presents the study protocol of the evaluation of the first SP project in Portugal. Methods: A mixed-methods study will be conducted to evaluate the SP project. For the quantitative component, a longitudinal, prospective study with a pre-post design will be performed. Data on patients referred to SP will be collected in four different points in time throughout the intervention, using questionnaires on patients' health status and sociodemographic characteristics, and scales on patients' well-being, quality of life and activation. The secondary data will be collected using patients' medical records and SP's forms about the referral and social responses elaborated within the intervention. Semi-structured interviews with patients and focus groups with stakeholders will be conducted to assess experiences of participation and improvement suggestions on SP. Conclusion: Comprehensive and complementary evidence will provide insights and learning for the implementation of future SP interventions. This can contribute to inform policy and practice, and to increase investment in social prescribing interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Social Prescribing in the US and England: Emerging Interventions to Address Patients' Social Needs
    Alderwick, Hugh A. J.
    Gottlieb, Laura M.
    Fichtenberg, Caroline M.
    Adler, Nancy E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 54 (05) : 715 - 718
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health-Final report of the commission on social determinants of health
  • [3] BARDIN L., 2016, ANALISE CONTEUDO, V70
  • [4] Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence
    Bickerdike, Liz
    Booth, Alison
    Wilson, Paul M.
    Farley, Kate
    Wright, Kath
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (04):
  • [5] The impact of a social prescribing service on patients in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation
    Carnes, Dawn
    Sohanpal, Ratna
    Frostick, Caroline
    Hull, Sally
    Mathur, Rohini
    Netuveli, Gopalakrishnan
    Tong, Jin
    Hutt, Patrick
    Bertotti, Marcello
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [6] Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes
    Chatterjee, Helen J.
    Camic, Paul M.
    Lockyer, Bridget
    Thomson, Linda J. M.
    [J]. ARTS & HEALTH, 2018, 10 (02) : 97 - 123
  • [7] Fancourt D, 2019, 67 WHO
  • [8] Advancing Social Prescribing with Implementation Science
    Gottlieb, Laura
    Cottrell, Erika K.
    Park, Brian
    Clark, Khaya D.
    Gold, Rachel
    Fichtenberg, Caroline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (03) : 315 - 321
  • [9] A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector
    Grant, G
    Goodenough, T
    Harvey, I
    Hine, C
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7232) : 419 - +
  • [10] Evaluation and exploration of a social prescribing initiative: Study protocol
    Halder, Moon M.
    Wakefield, Juliet R. H.
    Bowe, Mhairi
    Kellezi, Blerina
    Mair, Elizabeth
    McNamara, Niamh
    Wilson, Ian
    Stevenson, Clifford
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 26 (03) : 345 - 356