A combination of direct viable count and fluorescence in situ hybridization for specific enumeration of viable Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus

被引:6
作者
Garcia-Hernandez, J. [1 ]
Moreno, Y. [1 ]
Amorocho, C. M. [1 ]
Hernandez, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Dept Biotecnol, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
direct viable count; FISH; Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp; bulgaricus; rapid method; Streptococcus thermophilus; GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA; HELICOBACTER-PYLORI; DRINKING-WATER; LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES; YOGURT CONSUMPTION; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; FERMENTED MILK; HUMAN FECES; VIABILITY; CELLS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03201.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims: We have developed a direct viable count (DVC)-FISH procedure for quickly and easily discriminating between viable and nonviable cells of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus strains, the traditional yogurt bacteria. Methods and Results: direct viable count method has been modified and adapted for Lact. delbrueckii subsp, bulgaricus and Strep. thermophilus analysis by testing different times of incubation and concentrations of DNA-gyrase inhibitors. DVC procedure has been combined with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for the specific detection of viable cells of both bacteria with specific rRNA oligonucleotide probes (DVC-FISH). Of the four antibiotics tested (novobiocin, nalidixic acid, pipemidic acid and ciprofloxacin), novobiocin was the most effective for DVC method and the optimum incubation time was 7 h for both bacteria. The number of viable cells was obtained by the enumeration of specific hybridized cells that were elongated at least twice their original length for Lactobacillus and twice their original size for Streptococcus. Conclusions: This technique was successfully applied to detect viable cells in inoculated faeces. Significance and Impact of the Study: Results showed that this DVC-FISH procedure is a quick and culture-independent useful method to specifically detect viable Lact, delbrueckii subsp, bulgaricus and Strep thermophilus in different samples, being applied for the first time to lactic acid bacteria.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 254
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   PHYLOGENETIC IDENTIFICATION AND IN-SITU DETECTION OF INDIVIDUAL MICROBIAL-CELLS WITHOUT CULTIVATION [J].
AMANN, RI ;
LUDWIG, W ;
SCHLEIFER, KH .
MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1995, 59 (01) :143-169
[2]  
Ampe F, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P5464
[3]  
Armisen TG, 2004, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V50, P271
[4]   Direct in situ viability assessment of bacteria in probiotic dairy products using viability staining in conjunction with confocal scanning laser microscopy [J].
Auty, MAE ;
Gardiner, GE ;
McBrearty, SJ ;
O'Sullivan, EO ;
Mulvihill, DM ;
Collins, JK ;
Fitzgerald, GF ;
Stanton, C ;
Ross, RP .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 67 (01) :420-425
[5]   DIRECT VIABLE COUNT OF GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA USING CIPROFLOXACIN AS INHIBITOR OF CELLULAR DIVISION [J].
BARCINA, I ;
ARANA, I ;
SANTORUM, P ;
IRIBERRI, J ;
EGEA, L .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1995, 22 (02) :139-150
[6]   Rapid and sensitive enumeration of viable diluted cells of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae in freshwater and drinking water [J].
Baudart, J ;
Coallier, J ;
Laurent, P ;
Prévost, M .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 68 (10) :5057-5063
[7]  
Besnard V, 2000, LETT APPL MICROBIOL, V31, P77, DOI 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2000.00771.x
[8]  
BOUHNIK Y, 1993, LAIT, V73, P241, DOI 10.1051/lait:1993222
[9]   Factors influencing the detection of bacterial cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): A quantitative review of published reports [J].
Bouvier, T ;
del Giorgio, PA .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2003, 44 (01) :3-15
[10]   PCR detection of Bifidobacterium strains and Streptococcus thermophilus in feces of human subjects after oral bacteriotherapy and yogurt consumption [J].
Brigidi, P ;
Swennen, E ;
Vitali, B ;
Rossi, M ;
Matteuzzi, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 81 (03) :203-209