Population trends in cesarean delivery for breech presentation in the United States, 1997-2003

被引:27
作者
Lee, Henry Chong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
El-Sayed, Yasser Y. [4 ]
Gould, Jeffrey B. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Div Neonatal & Dev Med, Dept Pediat, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Perinatal Epidemiol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Hlth Outcomes Res Unit, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
breech; cesarean delivery; malpresentation; United States;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.059
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether cesarean delivery for breech has increased in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: We calculated cesarean rates for term singletons in breech/malpresentation from 1997 to 2003 using National Center for Health Statistics data. We compared rates by sociodemographic groups and state. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to see whether factors associated with cesarean delivery differed over time. RESULTS: Breech cesarean rates increased overall from 83.8% to 85.1%. There was a significant increase in rates for most sociodemographic groups. There was little to no increase for mothers younger than 30 years old. There was wide variability in rates by state, 61.6-94.2% in 1997. Higher breech incidence correlated with lower cesarean rates, suggesting potential state bias in reporting breech. CONCLUSION: In the United States, breech infants are predominantly born by cesarean. There was a small increase in this trend from 1998 to 2002. There is wide variability by state, which is not explained by sociodemographic patterns and may be due to reporting differences.
引用
收藏
页码:59.e1 / 59.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] *ACOG COMM, 2001, OBSTET GYNECOL, V98, P1189
  • [2] ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2006, Obstet Gynecol, V108, P235
  • [3] Evidence-based changes in term breech delivery practice in Sweden
    Alexandersson, O
    Bixo, M
    Högberg, U
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (06) : 584 - 587
  • [4] Peer review and the Term Breech Trial
    Bewley, Susan
    Shennan, Andrew
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 369 (9565) : 906 - 906
  • [5] Five years to the term breech trial: The rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial
    Glezerman, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [6] Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The international randomized Term Breech Trial
    Hannah, ME
    Whyte, H
    Hannah, WJ
    Hewson, S
    Amankwah, K
    Cheng, M
    Gafni, A
    Guselle, P
    Helewa, M
    Hodnett, ED
    Hutton, E
    Kung, R
    McKay, D
    Ross, S
    Saigal, S
    Willan, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (03) : 917 - 927
  • [7] Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial
    Hannah, ME
    Hannah, WJ
    Hewson, SA
    Hodnett, ED
    Saigal, S
    Willan, AR
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) : 1375 - 1383
  • [8] Kessner D.M., 1973, Infant death: an analysis by maternal risk and health care
  • [9] Kontopoulos E V, 2004, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V15, P219, DOI 10.1080/14767050410001668707
  • [10] Delivery mode by race for breech presentation in the US
    Lee, H. C.
    El-Sayed, Y. Y.
    Gould, J. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 27 (03) : 147 - 153