Collective action in China's recent collective forestry property rights reform

被引:34
作者
Liu, Pingyang [1 ]
Ravenscroft, Neil [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, 220 Handan Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Brighton, Sch Environm & Technol, Brighton BN2 4GJ, E Sussex, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Collective ownership; Collective forests; Collective action; Forestry property rights; China; RESOURCE USE; LAND; MANAGEMENT; LESSONS; SYSTEM; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China's recent collective forestry property rights reform (CFPRR) is regarded as the third Land Reform and has been implemented to accelerate China's rural restructuring. In departing from previous top down policy changes, the CFPRR has focused on local collective practices and actions. It indicates a shift in China's rural governance, away from direct intervention towards support for local collective actions. Based on a case study of Hongtian Village, the origin of the CFPRR, this article analyses the process of insinuating collective action and the impact that this has had in creating a new cultural understanding and acceptance of collective forestry property rights. In contrast to the relative insecurity of tenure that can accompany many reforms of the governance of common pool resources, the paper suggests that the success of the 'Hongtian model' mainly lies in high levels of process engagement by local people and effective interaction between villagers and the government. While not addressing all the issues associated with the inefficiency of the previous collective approach to forestry, the paper suggests that there are many transferable lessons to be learnt from the CFPRR, both within and beyond China. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 411
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Ostrom, E .
POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2001, 29 (04) :485-514
[2]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1974, CLASSIC PAPERS NATUR, DOI [DOI 10.1057/9780230523210, DOI 10.1057/9780230523210_9]
[4]   Governing open access: livestock distributions and institutional control in the Karakum Desert of Turkmenistan [J].
Behnke, Roy ;
Robinson, Sarah ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 52 :103-119
[5]  
Bell A, 2008, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V75, P1015
[6]   Deforestation and timber production in Congo after implementation of sustainable forest management policy [J].
Brandt, Jodi S. ;
Nolte, Christoph ;
Agrawal, Arun .
LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 52 :15-22
[7]   State actors and international forest certification policy: Coalitions behind FSC and PEFC in federal Argentina [J].
Burns, Sarah L. ;
Yapura, Pablo F. ;
Giessen, Lukas .
LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 52 :23-29
[8]  
Chattopadhyay S., 2008, ICFAI J ENV EC, V6
[9]   STRUCTURE OF A CONTRACT AND THEORY OF A NON-EXCLUSIVE RESOURCE [J].
CHEUNG, SNS .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1970, 13 (01) :49-70
[10]  
Dai G., 2002, FOR EC, V11, P30