A comparison of functional, patient-based scores in subacromial impingement

被引:48
作者
Cloke, DJ
Lynn, SE
Watson, H
Steen, IN
Purdy, S
Williams, JR
机构
[1] Freeman Rd Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Newcastle Upon Tyne, Sch Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Newcastle Upon Tyne, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2004.08.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this study was to compare the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) for their correlation, agreement, sensitivity to change, and test-retest reliability in patients with a clinical diagnosis of subacromial impingement. All patients attending a specialist subacromial impingement clinic over a 6-month period completed the OSS, SPADI, and SF-36 at each visit. A total of 323 sets of observations were recorded in 1 10 patients. The first 38 of these patients were also sent the questionnaires to complete before their visit. There was good correlation between the OSS and SPADI scores (correlation coefficient = 0.85) and good agreement between the scores on each scale (weighted K = 0.79). The correlation with total SF-36 was poor (0.37 for OSS and 0.26 for SPADI). The OSS and SPADI showed good effect sizes compared with the total SF-36 score and good test-retest reliability. These data support the use of the OSS or SPADI in patients with subacromial impingement.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 384
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires [J].
Beaton, D ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1998, 7 (06) :565-572
[2]   Measuring function of the shoulder - A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Richards, RR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (06) :882-890
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Measuring up to shoulder pain [J].
Croft, P .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1998, 57 (02) :65-66
[5]   Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Carr, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1996, 78B (04) :593-600
[6]   Comparison of clinical and patient-based measures to assess medium-term outcomes following shoulder surgery for disorders of the rotator cuff [J].
Dawson, J ;
Hill, G ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Carr, A .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2002, 47 (05) :513-519
[7]   The benefits of using patient-based methods of assessment [J].
Dawson, J ;
Hill, G ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Carr, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (06) :877-882
[8]   The shoulder pain and disability index: The construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure [J].
Heald, SL ;
Riddle, DL ;
Lamb, RL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1997, 77 (10) :1079-1089
[9]   EFFECT SIZES FOR INTERPRETING CHANGES IN HEALTH-STATUS [J].
KAZIS, LE ;
ANDERSON, JJ ;
MEENAN, RF .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) :S178-S189
[10]   Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: Responsiveness of disease-specific and health-related quality of life outcome measures [J].
O'Connor, DA ;
Chipchase, LS ;
Tomlinson, J ;
Krishnan, J .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1999, 15 (08) :836-840