How does basic research improve innovation performance in the world's major pharmaceutical firms?

被引:23
作者
Belderbos, Bart [1 ,2 ]
Kelchtermans, Stijn [1 ,2 ]
Leten, Rene [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Management Strategy & Innovat, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Hasselt Univ, Dept Mkt & Strategy, Diepenbeek, Belgium
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Org Strategy & Entrepreneurship, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Unu Merit, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Basic research; science-industry linkages; innovation; pharmaceutical industry; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PATENT CITATIONS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; SCIENTIFIC-RESEARCH; ACADEMIC RESEARCH; SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; PRODUCTIVITY; TECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1080/13662716.2021.1997723
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Employing a panel (1995-2015) of large R&D spending pharmaceutical firms, we investigate how internal basic research increases a firm's innovative performance. We disentangle two mechanisms through which internal basic research affects technology development: (1) as strengthening of the firm's absorptive capacity to build on externally conducted science, and (2) as a direct source of the firm's innovation. We find that the positive relationship between internal basic research and innovation performance is significantly mediated by these two mechanisms, with the absorptive capacity mechanism relatively more important. The mediation relationships are more pronounced in recent years, with basic research as a direct source of innovation increasing in importance. This pattern is associated with a decline of corporate investments in basic research over time, and suggests that firms have adopted a more judicious and targeted approach to basic research aimed at getting more leverage out of a smaller commitment to basic research.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 424
页数:29
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   FUNDAMENTAL STOCKS OF KNOWLEDGE AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH [J].
ADAMS, JD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (04) :673-702
[2]   Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows:: The influence of examiner citations [J].
Alcacer, Juan ;
Gittelman, Michelle .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2006, 88 (04) :774-779
[3]  
Allen T. J., 1977, Managing the flow of technology
[4]   Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models [J].
Allison, PD ;
Waterman, RP .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 2002, VOL 32, 2002, 32 :247-265
[5]   Individual scientific collaborations and firm-level innovation [J].
Almeida, Paul ;
Hohberger, Jan ;
Parada, Pedro .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2011, 20 (06) :1571-1599
[6]   COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES - THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY [J].
ARORA, A ;
GAMBARDELLA, A .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 38 (04) :361-379
[7]  
Arora A., 2020, Innovation Policy and the Economy, V20, P39, DOI [DOI 10.1086/705638, https://doi.org/10.1086/705638, 10.1086/705638]
[8]   Knowledge Spillovers and Corporate Investment in Scientific Research [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Sheer, Lia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 111 (03) :871-898
[9]   The decline of science in corporate R&D [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Belenzon, Sharon ;
Patacconi, Andrea .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (01) :3-32
[10]   A Breath of Fresh Air? Firm Type, Scale, Scope, and Selection Effects in Drug Development [J].
Arora, Ashish ;
Gambardella, Alfonso ;
Magazzini, Laura ;
Pammolli, Fabio .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (10) :1638-1653