How Footwear Is Assessed in Patient Reported Measures for People with Arthritis: A Scoping Review

被引:0
|
作者
Tehan, Peta E. [1 ]
Carroll, Matthew [1 ]
Dalbeth, Nicola [2 ]
Rome, Keith [1 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth & Environm Sci, Sch Clin Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; RISK-FACTORS; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; DISABILITY; IMPAIRMENT; MANAGEMENT; SCALE; SHOES;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.12182
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: In people with arthritis, footwear may influence foot function, pain, and mobility. In order to measure the effectiveness of interventions and patient experience, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are frequently used. The aim of the scoping review was to identify footwear item content within foot-specific PROMs and PREMs used in people with arthritis. Method: Original studies that developed or validated a footwear-inclusive PROM or PREM for use in people with arthritis affecting the foot were included. A comprehensive search was conducted using AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Ovid Emcare and Embase. A content analysis of extracted footwear content items was performed, by coding item content and grouping into broad themes, then further narrowing down and defining themes under five main categories. Results: Nineteen articles satisfied inclusion criteria for this scoping exercise. Eleven PROMs met the inclusion criteria, five of which were designed for use in disease-specific populations (rheumatoid arthritis and gout) and six designed for generic populations. Categories of the footwear specific content from the PROMs included pain, impairment and function, shoe-specific characteristics, and psychosocial aspects. None of the included PROMs assessed footwear satisfaction. Eight PREMs relating to footwear experiences were identified. Seven of the PREMs were disease specific (inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic sclerosis) and one was generic. Content of the footwear-related items of the included PREMs were categorized under pain, impairment and function, footwear satisfaction, and shoe-specific characteristics. None of the PREM studies reported on psychosocial aspects of footwear. Conclusions: Many different instruments have been used to measure the experience of footwear in patients with arthritis. However, no comprehensive tool that evaluates footwear and its relationship with pain, impairment, and disability; the psychosocial aspects of footwear; specific footwear features; and satisfaction is currently available for use in people with arthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 167
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combining patient-reported outcome measures to screen for active disease in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis
    Looijen, Agnes E. M.
    Snoeck Henkemans, Selinde V. J.
    van der Helm-van Mil, Annette H. M.
    Welsing, Paco M. J.
    Koc, Gonul Hazal
    Luime, Jolanda J.
    Kok, Marc R.
    Tchetverikov, Ilja
    Korswagen, Lindy-Anne
    Baudoin, Paul
    Vis, Marijn
    de Jong, Pascal H. P.
    RMD OPEN, 2024, 10 (04):
  • [42] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues
    Churruca, Kate
    Pomare, Chiara
    Ellis, Louise A.
    Long, Janet C.
    Henderson, Suzanna B.
    Murphy, Lisa E. D.
    Leahy, Christopher J.
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (04) : 1015 - 1024
  • [43] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for advance care planning in older people: A COSMIN systematic review
    Jo, Minjeong
    Park, Mihyun
    Hwang, Hye-lyung
    Chung, Heejin
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2025, 23
  • [44] Patient Reported Outcome Measures used in Surgical Evaluation of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review
    Bhat, Amrita
    Singh, Amritpal
    Durr, Megan L.
    Chang, Jolie L.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, : 4838 - 4846
  • [45] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Mohs Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Garg, Neha
    Mandloi, Shreya
    Queenan, Natalia
    Trivedi, Jay
    Mccann, Adam
    Xu, Vivian
    Amin, Dev
    Krein, Howard
    Heffelfinger, Ryan
    OTO OPEN, 2024, 8 (04)
  • [46] Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
    Shilling, Valerie
    Matthews, Lucy
    Jenkins, Valerie
    Fallowfield, Lesley
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (08) : 1859 - 1876
  • [47] A Scoping Review of Measures Utilized to Assess Patient Satisfaction with Acupuncture Treatments Within Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jackson, Heather J.
    Reneau, Marcelaine G.
    Hande, Karen
    MEDICAL ACUPUNCTURE, 2022, 34 (05) : 308 - 315
  • [48] Clinician-reported outcome measures for the assessment of vitiligo: A scoping review
    van Geel, Nanja
    Duponselle, Jolien
    Delbaere, Liesbeth
    Herbelet, Sandrine
    Eleftheriadou, Viktoria
    Ezzedine, Khaled
    Forman, Maxine
    Garg, Amit
    Hamzavi, Iltefat H.
    Seneschal, Julien
    Spuls, Phyllis
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Wolkerstorfer, Albert
    Speeckaert, Reinhart
    Pandya, Amit G.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2023, 37 (11) : 2231 - 2242
  • [49] Measuring Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction in Facial Paralysis Patients: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Ho, Adelyn L.
    Scott, Amie M.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Van Laeken, Nancy
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (01) : 91 - 99
  • [50] Patient-reported outcome measures in subarachnoid hemorrhage A systematic review
    Nobels-Janssen, Edith
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Verhagen, Wim I. M.
    Westert, Gert P.
    Bartels, Ronald H. M. A.
    Boogaarts, Jeroen D.
    NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (23) : 1096 - 1112