Community and facility-level engagement in planning and budgeting for the government health sector - A district perspective from Kenya

被引:42
作者
O'Meara, Wendy Prudhomme [1 ,2 ]
Tsofa, Benjamin [3 ]
Molyneux, Sassy [3 ]
Goodman, Catherine [4 ,5 ]
McKenzie, F. Ellis [6 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Global Hlth Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] KEMRI Wellcome Trust Res Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
[4] KEMRI Wellcome Trust Res Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
[5] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Hlth Policy Unit, London WC1, England
[6] NIH, Fogarty Int Ctr, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Health planning; Decentralization; Community participation; PARTICIPATION; DECENTRALIZATION; REFORM; TANZANIA; UGANDA;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.027
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Health systems reform processes have increasingly recognized the essential contribution of communities to the success of health programs and development activities in general. Here we examine the experience from Kilifi district in Kenya of implementing annual health sector planning guidelines that included community participation in problem identification, priority setting, and planning. We describe challenges in the implementation of national planning guidelines, how these were met, and how they influenced final plans and budgets. The broad-based community engagement envisaged in the guidelines did not take place due to the delay in roll out of the Ministry of Health-trained community health workers. Instead, community engagement was conducted through facility management committees, though in a minority of facilities, even such committees were not involved. Some overlap was found in the priorities highlighted by facility staff, committee members and national indicators, but there were also many additional issues raised by committee members and not by other groups. The engagement of the community through committees influenced target and priority setting, but the emphasis on national health indicators left many local priorities unaddressed by the final work plans. Moreover, it appears that the final impact on budgets allocated at district and facility level was limited. The experience in Kilifi highlights the feasibility of engaging the community in the health planning process, and the challenges of ensuring that this engagement feeds into consolidated plans and future implementation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 243
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, World Development Report: Making Services Work for Poor People
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, WORLD HLTH REP PRIM
[3]   Local governance and community financing of primary care: evidence from Nepal [J].
Bishai, D ;
Niessen, LW ;
Shrestha, M .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2002, 17 (02) :202-206
[4]   BOTTOM-UP PLANNING IN INDONESIA - DECENTRALIZATION IN THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH [J].
BOSSERT, T ;
SOEBEKTI, R ;
RAI, NK .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 1991, 6 (01) :55-63
[5]   Decentralization of health systems in Ghana, Zambia, Uganda and the Philippines: a comparative analysis of decision space [J].
Bossert, TJ ;
Beauvais, JC .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2002, 17 (01) :14-31
[6]   PARTICIPATION - MYTHS, REALITIES AND PROGNOSIS [J].
BROWNLEA, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1987, 25 (06) :605-614
[7]   Decentralisation and service delivery: Lessons from sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Conyers, Diana .
IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2007, 38 (01) :18-+
[8]  
Cornwall A, 2000, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V31, P1
[9]  
DESAVIGNY D, 2002, 2 TEHIP
[10]   The equity impacts of community financing activities in three African countries [J].
Gilson, L ;
Kalyalya, D ;
Kuchler, F ;
Lake, S ;
Oranga, H ;
Ouendo, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 15 (04) :291-317