Residual Hearing Preservation After Pediatric Cochlear Implantation

被引:64
作者
Brown, Ryan F. [1 ]
Hullar, Timothy E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cadieux, Jamie H. [3 ,4 ]
Chole, Richard A. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Program Audiol & Commun Sci, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, St Louis Childrens Hosp, Cochlear Implant Program, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Dev Biol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Cochlear implant; Electroacoustic stimulation; Hearing conservation; Hearing loss; Hearing preservation; Pediatric; Soft surgery; LOW-FREQUENCY HEARING; PARTIAL DEAFNESS; CONSERVATION; ELECTRODE; STIMULATION; CHILDREN; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f0c649
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study is designed to test the hypothesis that preservation of residual hearing in a pediatric population is possible using standard electrode arrays with full-length insertions. Surgical technique during implantation also is described. Study Design: Retrospective review of patient medical records. Setting: Academic tertiary care center. Patients: Thirty-one severely to profoundly hearing impaired pediatric patients with some residual hearing precochlear implantation. Intervention: Cochlear implantation using a modified "soft surgery" protocol. Main Outcome Measures: Preimplant and postimplant pure tone thresholds and pure-tone average were calculated from unaided preoperative and postoperative audiograms from 250, 500, and 1,000 Hz. Hearing preservation rates were determined to be complete (loss of <= 10 dB), moderate (loss of 11-20 dB), marginal (loss of 21-40 dB), or none (loss of 940 dB or no response at the limits of the audiometer). Functional residual hearing rates (defined in this study as at least 1 threshold better than or equal to 75 dB HL for 250, 500, or 1,000 Hz were calculated. Results: Complete hearing preservation was achieved in 14 (45.2%) of 31 patients, whereas 28 (90.3%) of 31 had at least partial hearing preservation (loss of <= 40 dB). The preoperative to postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average had a mean change of 18.5 dB and median change of 20 dB. Of the patients who had preoperative functional hearing, 9 (50.0%) of 18 maintained functional residual hearing postoperatively for at least 1 pitch. Conclusion: Preservation of residual hearing is feasible in pediatric cochlear implant patients using standard-length electrode arrays with full insertions. These data have implications for cochlear implantation in pediatric patients who are at higher risk of progressive hearing loss than adults.
引用
收藏
页码:1221 / 1226
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation [J].
Balkany, Thomas J. ;
Connell, Sarah S. ;
Hodges, Annelle V. ;
Payne, Stacy L. ;
Telischi, Fred F. ;
Eshraghi, Adrien A. ;
Angeli, Simon I. ;
Germani, Ross ;
Messiah, Sarah ;
Arheart, Kristopher L. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (08) :1083-1088
[2]   Impact of Low-Frequency Hearing [J].
Buechner, A. ;
Schuessler, M. ;
Battmer, R. D. ;
Stoever, T. ;
Lesinski-Schiedat, A. ;
Lenarz, T. .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2009, 14 :8-13
[3]   Residual hearing in cochlear implant patients [J].
Di Nardo, Walter ;
Cantore, Italo ;
Melillo, Pietro ;
Cianfrone, Francesca ;
Scorpecci, Alessandro ;
Paludetti, Gaetano .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 264 (08) :855-860
[4]  
Fitzgerald MB, 2008, OTOL NEUROTOL, V29, P168, DOI 10.1097/mao.0b013e31815c4875
[5]   Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant [J].
Fraysse, Bernard ;
Macias, Angel Ramos ;
Sterkers, Olivier ;
Burdo, Sandro ;
Ramsden, Richard ;
Deguine, Olivier ;
Klenzner, Thomas ;
Lenarz, Thomas ;
Rodriguez, Manuel Manrique ;
Von Wallenberg, Ernst ;
James, Chris .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (05) :624-633
[6]   Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing [J].
Gantz, BJ ;
Turner, C ;
Gfeller, KE ;
Lowder, MW .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (05) :796-802
[7]   Hybrid 10 Clinical Trial Preliminary Results [J].
Gantz, Bruce J. ;
Hansen, Marlan R. ;
Turner, Christopher W. ;
Oleson, Jacob J. ;
Reiss, Lina A. ;
Parkinson, Aaron J. .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2009, 14 :32-38
[8]   An evaluation of the preservation of residual hearing with the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode [J].
Garcia-Ibanez, Luis ;
Ramos Macias, Angel ;
Morera, Constantino ;
Manrique Rodriguez, Manuel ;
Szyfter, Witold ;
Skarszynski, Henryk ;
Emamdjomeh, Hessam ;
Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2009, 129 (06) :651-664
[9]   Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation [J].
Gstoettner, W ;
Kiefer, J ;
Baumgartner, WD ;
Pok, S ;
Peters, S ;
Adunka, O .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2004, 124 (04) :348-352
[10]  
Hodges A, 1997, AM J OTOL, V18, P179