Risk preference differentials of small groups and individuals

被引:110
作者
Shupp, Robert S. [1 ]
Williams, Arlington W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02112.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research compares lottery valuation decisions made by individuals with similar decisions made by small groups. There is an extensive social psychology literature addressing group versus individual decision making but few studies explore this issue in economic contexts with cash rewards. Willingness-to-pay data elicited from independent samples of individuals and three-person groups in a repeated-measures experimental design reveal that: the variance of risk preferences is generally smaller for groups than individuals and the average group is more risk averse than the average individual in high-risk situations, but groups tend to be less risk averse in low-risk situations.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 283
页数:26
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
BAKER RJ, 2006, UNPUB COMPARING GROU
[2]   An experiment on risky choice amongst households [J].
Bateman, I ;
Munro, A .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2005, 115 (502) :C176-C189
[3]   Are groups more (or less) consistent than individuals? [J].
Bone, J ;
Hey, J ;
Suckling, J .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 18 (01) :63-81
[4]  
Bornstein G., 1998, EXPT EC, V1, P101, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009914001822
[5]  
Cameron A.C., 2005, MICROECONOMETRICS ME, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511811241
[6]   A laboratory study of group polarisation in the team dictator game [J].
Cason, TN ;
Mui, VL .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1997, 107 (444) :1465-1483
[7]  
Cox J.C., 2002, Experimental Business Research, P331
[8]   Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents? [J].
Cox, James C. ;
Hayne, Stephen C. .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 9 (03) :209-222
[9]  
HARRISON GW, 2005, UNPUB PREFERENCES SO
[10]   Risk aversion and incentive effects [J].
Holt, CA ;
Laury, SK .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (05) :1644-1655