Prognostic Value of KRAS Exon 3 and Exon 4 Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Patients

被引:9
|
作者
Guo, Tianan [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Yuchen [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Dan [2 ,3 ]
Jin, Yutong [4 ]
Shen, Weiqi [2 ,3 ]
Cai, Sanjun [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xiaoyan [2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Xiaoli [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Fangqi [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ye [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Colorectal Surg, Shanghai Canc Ctr, 270 Dong An Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Dept Pathol, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER | 2021年 / 12卷 / 17期
关键词
KRAS exon 3; KRAS exon 4; KRAS mutations; colorectal cancer; clinicopathologic features; prognosis; RAS MUTATIONS; TUMOR DEPOSITS; BRAF MUTATION; CETUXIMAB; HEPATECTOMY; IRINOTECAN; SURVIVAL; BENEFIT; TNM;
D O I
10.7150/jca.59193
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The clinical significance of KRAS exon 3/4 mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of KRAS exons 3 and 4 mutations to determine the necessity for their testing. Methods: KRAS mutations in exon 2/3/4 were evaluated in 1816 stage I-IV patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Results: The mutation rates of KRAS and KRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 were 49.0%, 43.0%, 1.9%, and 4.1%, respectively. Univariate survival analysis showed that patients with exon 3 mutation had worse overall survival (OS) compared to those with KRAS exon 2 mutation or wild-type KRAS (P = 0.044, and P = 0.001). Meanwhile, there was no difference in survival between patients with wild-type KRAS and with exon 4 mutation (P = 0.128). In multivariate analysis, KRAS mutations in exon 3 and 2 were both independent factors for worse OS (Exon 3, P = 0.032, HR = 1.861, 95% CI: 1.021-3.391; Exon 2, P = 0.049, HR = 1.298, 95% CI: 1.002-1.682). Among the patients with KRAS exon 2 mutations, those that had mutations in codon 13 had significantly worse prognosis than those with wild-type KRAS (P = 0.001) or KRAS codon 12 mutations (P = 0.003). Conclusions: In KRAS-mutated CRC, exon 3 mutations predict the worst prognosis, while exon 4 mutations predict the best prognosis. Among KRAS exon 2 mutated patients, codon 13 mutations predict worse prognosis than codon 12 mutations. Mutations of different KRAS exons should be analyzed separately.
引用
收藏
页码:5331 / 5337
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] KRAS Exon 3 and PTEN Exon 7 Mutations in Small-cell Lung Cancer
    Lei, Lei
    Jiang, Zhi-ming
    Li, Cheng-hui
    Lu, Hong-yang
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 39 (03) : 379 - 384
  • [12] The Prognostic Utility of KRAS Mutations in Tissue and Circulating Tumour DNA in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Petit, Joel
    Carroll, Georgia
    Zhao, Jie
    Pockney, Peter
    Scott, Rodney J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY INSIGHTS, 2024, 15 (01) : 107 - 121
  • [13] Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Value of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Patients of Central China
    Chang, Xiao-na
    Shang, Fu-mei
    Jiang, Hong-yu
    Chen, Chen
    Zhao, Zhe-yan
    Deng, Sheng-he
    Fan, Jun
    Dong, Xiao-chuan
    Yang, Ming
    Li, Yan
    Cai, Kai-lin
    Liu, Li
    Liu, Hong-li
    Nie, Xiu
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 41 (01) : 118 - 126
  • [14] Impact of primary colorectal Cancer location on the KRAS status and its prognostic value
    Xie, Ming-zhi
    Li, Ji-lin
    Cai, Zheng-min
    Li, Ke-zhi
    Hu, Bang-li
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 19
  • [15] Prognostic Value of Autophagy, Microsatellite Instability, and KRAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Zhao, Zhi
    Zhuang, Jing
    Wu, Xinxin
    Wang, Zhizhong
    Zhang, Bing
    Gao, Ge
    Zhang, Yinping
    Guo, Caili
    Xia, Qingxin
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 12 (12): : 3515 - 3528
  • [16] KRAS alterations in colorectal liver metastases: shifting to exon, codon, and point mutations
    Olthof, Pim B.
    Buettner, Stefan
    Andreatos, Nikolaos
    Wang, Jane
    Loes, Inger Marie
    Wagner, Doris
    Sasaki, Kazunari
    Macher-Beer, Andrea
    Kamphues, Carsten
    Pozios, Ioannis
    Seeliger, Hendrik
    Morioka, Daisuke
    Imai, Katsunori
    Kaczirek, Klaus
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Poultsides, George
    Burkhart, Richard
    Endo, Itaru
    Baba, Hideo
    Kornprat, Peter
    Aucejo, Federico N.
    Lonning, Per Eystein
    Beyer, Katharina
    Weiss, Matthew J.
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Kreis, Martin E.
    Margonis, Georgios A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (09) : 804 - 807
  • [17] Distribution of KRAS and BRAF mutations in Moroccan patients with advanced colorectal cancer
    Marchoudi, N.
    Amrani Hassani Joutei, H.
    Jouali, F.
    Fekkak, J.
    Rhaissi, H.
    PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE, 2013, 61 (06): : 273 - 276
  • [18] KRAS Exon 2 Mutations in Patients with Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: Prevalence Variations in Mexican and Latin American Populations
    Venegas-Rodriguez, Jose Luis
    Hernandez-Sandoval, Jesus Arturo
    Gutierrez-Angulo, Melva
    Moreno-Ortiz, Jose Miguel
    Gonzalez-Mercado, Anahi
    Peregrina-Sandoval, Jorge
    Ramirez-Plascencia, Helen Haydee Fernanda
    Flores-Lopez, Beatriz Armida
    Alvizo-Rodriguez, Carlos Rogelio
    Valenzuela-Perez, Jesus Alonso
    Cervantes-Ortiz, Sergio
    Ayala-Madrigal, Maria de la Luz
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [19] Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Value of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Patients of Central China
    Xiao-na Chang
    Fu-mei Shang
    Hong-yu Jiang
    Chen Chen
    Zhe-yan Zhao
    Sheng-he Deng
    Jun Fan
    Xiao-chuan Dong
    Ming Yang
    Yan Li
    Kai-lin Cai
    Li Liu
    Hong-li Liu
    Xiu Nie
    Current Medical Science, 2021, 41 : 118 - 126
  • [20] Prognostic role of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in advanced colorectal cancer
    Foltran, Luisa
    De Maglio, Giovanna
    Pella, Nicoletta
    Ermacora, Paola
    Aprile, Giuseppe
    Masiero, Elena
    Giovannoni, Mariella
    Iaiza, Emiliana
    Cardellino, Giovanni Gerardo
    Lutrino, Stefania Eufemia
    Mazzer, Micol
    Giangreco, Manuela
    Pisa, Federica Edith
    Pizzolitto, Stefano
    Fasola, Gianpiero
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (04) : 629 - 640