Prognostic Value of KRAS Exon 3 and Exon 4 Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Patients

被引:9
|
作者
Guo, Tianan [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Yuchen [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Dan [2 ,3 ]
Jin, Yutong [4 ]
Shen, Weiqi [2 ,3 ]
Cai, Sanjun [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xiaoyan [2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Xiaoli [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Fangqi [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ye [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Colorectal Surg, Shanghai Canc Ctr, 270 Dong An Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Dept Pathol, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER | 2021年 / 12卷 / 17期
关键词
KRAS exon 3; KRAS exon 4; KRAS mutations; colorectal cancer; clinicopathologic features; prognosis; RAS MUTATIONS; TUMOR DEPOSITS; BRAF MUTATION; CETUXIMAB; HEPATECTOMY; IRINOTECAN; SURVIVAL; BENEFIT; TNM;
D O I
10.7150/jca.59193
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The clinical significance of KRAS exon 3/4 mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of KRAS exons 3 and 4 mutations to determine the necessity for their testing. Methods: KRAS mutations in exon 2/3/4 were evaluated in 1816 stage I-IV patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Results: The mutation rates of KRAS and KRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 were 49.0%, 43.0%, 1.9%, and 4.1%, respectively. Univariate survival analysis showed that patients with exon 3 mutation had worse overall survival (OS) compared to those with KRAS exon 2 mutation or wild-type KRAS (P = 0.044, and P = 0.001). Meanwhile, there was no difference in survival between patients with wild-type KRAS and with exon 4 mutation (P = 0.128). In multivariate analysis, KRAS mutations in exon 3 and 2 were both independent factors for worse OS (Exon 3, P = 0.032, HR = 1.861, 95% CI: 1.021-3.391; Exon 2, P = 0.049, HR = 1.298, 95% CI: 1.002-1.682). Among the patients with KRAS exon 2 mutations, those that had mutations in codon 13 had significantly worse prognosis than those with wild-type KRAS (P = 0.001) or KRAS codon 12 mutations (P = 0.003). Conclusions: In KRAS-mutated CRC, exon 3 mutations predict the worst prognosis, while exon 4 mutations predict the best prognosis. Among KRAS exon 2 mutated patients, codon 13 mutations predict worse prognosis than codon 12 mutations. Mutations of different KRAS exons should be analyzed separately.
引用
收藏
页码:5331 / 5337
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic Value of KRAS Exon-specific Mutations in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Asako, Kentaro
    Hayama, Tamuro
    Hashiguchi, Yojiro
    Miyata, Toshiya
    Fukushima, Yoshihisa
    Shimada, Ryu
    Kaneko, Kensuke
    Nozawa, Keijiro
    Matsuda, Keiji
    Fukagawa, Takeo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (04) : 1563 - 1568
  • [2] The prognostic value of KRAS mutations in patients with colorectal cancer
    Inoue, Yasuhiro
    Saigusa, Susumu
    Iwata, Takashi
    Okugawa, Yoshinaga
    Toiyama, Yuji
    Tanaka, Koji
    Uchida, Keiichi
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Kusunoki, Masato
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2012, 28 (05) : 1579 - 1584
  • [3] Prognostic Value of KRAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Koulouridi, Asimina
    Karagianni, Michaela
    Messaritakis, Ippokratis
    Sfakianaki, Maria
    Voutsina, Alexandra
    Trypaki, Maria
    Bachlitzanaki, Maria
    Koustas, Evangelos
    Karamouzis, Michalis, V
    Ntavatzikos, Anastasios
    Koumarianou, Anna
    Androulakis, Nikolaos
    Mavroudis, Dimitrios
    Tzardi, Maria
    Souglakos, John
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (14)
  • [4] Prognostic and Predictive Value of RAS Gene Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Moving Beyond KRAS Exon 2
    Nele Boeckx
    Marc Peeters
    Guy Van Camp
    Patrick Pauwels
    Ken Op de Beeck
    Vanessa Deschoolmeester
    Drugs, 2015, 75 : 1739 - 1756
  • [5] Mutations matter: An observational study of the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Lavacchi, Daniele
    Fancelli, Sara
    Roviello, Giandomenico
    Castiglione, Francesca
    Caliman, Enrico
    Rossi, Gemma
    Venturini, Jacopo
    Pellegrini, Elisa
    Brugia, Marco
    Vannini, Agnese
    Bartoli, Caterina
    Cianchi, Fabio
    Pillozzi, Serena
    Antonuzzo, Lorenzo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [6] Clinical characteristics and prognostic value of the KRAS mutation in Chinese colorectal cancer patients
    Yuan, Ye
    Liu, Yingting
    Wu, Ye
    Zhang, Junling
    Shen, Chunti
    Zhang, Feng
    Wu, Changping
    Hu, Wenwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS, 2021, 36 (02) : 33 - 39
  • [7] KRAS Exon 2 Mutations as Prognostic Indicators in Advanced Colorectal Cancer in Clinical Practice: A Mono-Institutional Study
    Dadduzio, Vincenzo
    Basso, Michele
    Rossi, Sabrina
    Cenci, Tonia
    Capodimonti, Sara
    Strippoli, Antonia
    Orlandi, Armando
    Cerchiaro, Eleonora
    Schinzari, Giovanni
    Cassano, Alessandra
    Martini, Maurizio
    Barone, Carlo
    MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS & THERAPY, 2016, 20 (01) : 65 - 74
  • [8] Genomic and Biological Characterization of Exon 4 KRAS Mutations in Human Cancer
    Janakiraman, Manickam
    Vakiani, Efsevia
    Zeng, Zhaoshi
    Pratilas, Christine A.
    Taylor, Barry S.
    Chitale, Dhananjay
    Halilovic, Ensar
    Wilson, Manda
    Huberman, Kety
    Ricarte Filho, Julio Cezar
    Persaud, Yogindra
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Fagin, James A.
    Jhanwar, Suresh C.
    Mariadason, John M.
    Lash, Alex
    Ladanyi, Marc
    Saltz, Leonard B.
    Heguy, Adriana
    Paty, Philip B.
    Solit, David B.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70 (14) : 5901 - 5911
  • [9] Prognostic relevance of KRAS and BRAF mutations in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer
    Nakanishi, Ryota
    Harada, Jun
    Tuul, Munkhbold
    Zhao, Yan
    Ando, Koji
    Saeki, Hiroshi
    Oki, Eiji
    Ohga, Takefumi
    Kitao, Hiroyuki
    Kakeji, Yoshihiro
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 18 (06) : 1042 - 1048
  • [10] KRAS Exon 3 and PTEN Exon 7 Mutations in Small-cell Lung Cancer
    Lei Lei
    Zhi-ming Jiang
    Cheng-hui Li
    Hong-yang Lu
    Current Medical Science, 2019, 39 : 379 - 384