Improving Present Practices in the Visual Display of Interactions

被引:213
作者
McCabe, Connor J. [1 ]
Kim, Dale S. [2 ,3 ]
King, Kevin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, 119A Guthrie Hall,UW Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Stat, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
interaction; moderation; simple slopes; regions of significance; data visualization; open data; open materials; MODERATED MULTIPLE-REGRESSION; PROBING INTERACTIONS; INTERACTION TERMS; POWER; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1177/2515245917746792
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Interaction plots are used frequently in psychology research to make inferences about moderation hypotheses. A common method of analyzing and displaying interactions is to create simple-slopes or marginal-effects plots using standard software programs. However, these plots omit features that are essential to both graphic integrity and statistical inference. For example, they often do not display all quantities of interest, omit information about uncertainty, or do not show the observed data underlying an interaction, and failure to include these features undermines the strength of the inferences that may be drawn from such displays. Here, we review the strengths and limitations of present practices in analyzing and visualizing interaction effects in psychology. We provide simulated examples of the conditions under which visual displays may lead to inappropriate inferences and introduce open-source software that provides optimized utilities for analyzing and visualizing interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 165
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   STATISTICAL POWER PROBLEMS WITH MODERATED MULTIPLE-REGRESSION IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH [J].
AGUINIS, H .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1995, 21 (06) :1141-1158
[2]   Interaction terms in logit and probit models [J].
Ai, CR ;
Norton, EC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) :123-129
[3]  
American Psychological Association, 2010, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V6th
[4]   Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction [J].
Berry, William D. ;
Golder, Matt ;
Milton, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2012, 74 (03) :653-671
[5]   PERSONALITY MODERATING VARIABLES - A WARNING ABOUT STATISTICAL ARTIFACT AND A COMPARISON OF ANALYTIC TECHNIQUES [J].
BISSONNETTE, V ;
ICKES, W ;
BERNSTEIN, I ;
KNOWLES, E .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1990, 58 (03) :567-587
[6]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[7]  
Chang Winston, 2024, CRAN
[8]  
Cohen J., 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, DOI 10.4324/9780203774441
[9]   The New Statistics: Why and How [J].
Cumming, Geoff .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (01) :7-29
[10]   Some Common Myths About Centering Predictor Variables in Moderated Multiple Regression and Polynomial Regression [J].
Dalal, Dev K. ;
Zickar, Michael J. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 15 (03) :339-362