A simple method for estimating relative risk using logistic regression

被引:99
作者
Diaz-Quijano, Fredi A. [1 ]
机构
[1] OLFIS, Grp Latinoamericano Invest Epidemiol, Bucaramanga, Colombia
关键词
Logistic regression; Odds ratio; Prevalence ratio; Relative risk; CROSS-SECTIONAL DATA; ODDS RATIO; COHORT;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2288-12-14
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Odds ratios (OR) significantly overestimate associations between risk factors and common outcomes. The estimation of relative risks (RR) or prevalence ratios (PR) has represented a statistical challenge in multivariate analysis and, furthermore, some researchers do not have access to the available methods. Objective: To propose and evaluate a new method for estimating RR and PR by logistic regression. Methods: A provisional database was designed in which events were duplicated but identified as non-events. After, a logistic regression was performed and effect measures were calculated, which were considered RR estimations. This method was compared with binomial regression, Cox regression with robust variance and ordinary logistic regression in analyses with three outcomes of different frequencies. Results: ORs estimated by ordinary logistic regression progressively overestimated RRs as the outcome frequency increased. RRs estimated by Cox regression and the method proposed in this article were similar to those estimated by binomial regression for every outcome. However, confidence intervals were wider with the proposed method. Conclusion: This simple tool could be useful for calculating the effect of risk factors and the impact of health interventions in developing countries when other statistical strategies are not available.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: An empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio [J].
Aluísio JD Barros ;
Vânia N Hirakata .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3 (1) :1-13
[2]  
Coutinho Leticia M S, 2008, Rev. Saúde Pública, V42, P992, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102008000600003
[3]  
Flanders W D, 1990, Epidemiology, V1, P34, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00008
[4]  
Kulathinal Sangita, 2007, Epidemiol Perspect Innov, V4, P15
[5]  
LEE J, 1993, BRIT J IND MED, V50, P861
[6]  
Lee J, 2009, ANN ACAD MED SINGAP, V38, P714
[7]   Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression [J].
Localio, A. Russell ;
Margolis, David J. ;
Berlin, Jesse A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (09) :874-882
[8]   Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes [J].
McNutt, LA ;
Wu, CT ;
Xue, XN ;
Hafner, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (10) :940-943
[9]  
Nijem K., 2005, Norsk Epidemiologi, V15, P111, DOI [10.5324/nje.v15i1.233, DOI 10.5324/NJE.V15I1.233]
[10]   Effect measures in prevalence studies [J].
Pearce, N .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 112 (10) :1047-1050