On single-peaked domains and min-max rules

被引:7
作者
Achuthankutty, Gopakumar [1 ]
Roy, Souvik [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Stat Inst, Econ Res Unit, Kolkata, India
关键词
MEDIAN VOTER SCHEMES; STRATEGY-PROOFNESS; SOCIAL CHOICE; VOTING SCHEMES; MAJORITY-RULE; PREFERENCES; EXISTENCE; ECONOMY; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s00355-018-1137-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider social choice problems where the admissible set of preferences of each agent is single-peaked. First, we show that if all the agents have the same admissible set of preferences, then every unanimous and strategy-proof social choice function (SCF) is tops-only. Next, we consider situations where different agents have different admissible sets of single-peaked preferences. We show by means of an example that unanimous and strategy-proof SCFs need not be tops-only in this situation, and consequently provide a sufficient condition on the admissible sets of preferences of the agents so that unanimity and strategy-proofness guarantee tops-onlyness. Finally, we characterize all domains on which (i) every unanimous and strategy-proof SCF is a min-max rule, and (ii) every min-max rule is strategy-proof. As an application of our result, we obtain a characterization of the unanimous and strategy-proof social choice functions on maximal single-peaked domains (Moulin in Public Choice 35(4):437-455. 10.1007/BF00128122, 1980; Weymark in SERIEs 2(4):529-550. 10.1007/s13209-011-0064-5, 2011), minimally rich single-peaked domains (Peters et al. in J Math Econ 52:123-127. 10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.03.008. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406814000470, 2014), maximal regular single-crossing domains (Saporiti in Theor Econ 4(2):127-163, 2009, J Econ Theory 154:216-228. 10.1016/j.jet.2014.09.006. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053114001276, 2009), and distance based single-peaked domains.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 772
页数:20
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ARROW KJ, 1969, PUBLIC CHOICE, V6, P105, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01718583
[2]   Dictatorial domains [J].
Aswal, N ;
Chatterji, S ;
Sen, A .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2003, 22 (01) :45-62
[3]   Choosing how to choose: Self-stable majority rules and constitutions [J].
Barbera, S ;
Jackson, MO .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (03) :1011-1048
[4]   GENERALIZED MEDIAN VOTER SCHEMES AND COMMITTEES [J].
BARBERA, S ;
GUL, F ;
STACCHETTI, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1993, 61 (02) :262-289
[5]   STRATEGY-PROOF VOTING SCHEMES WITH CONTINUOUS PREFERENCES [J].
BARBERA, S ;
PELEG, B .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1990, 7 (01) :31-38
[6]   Maximal domains of preferences preserving strategy-proofness for generalized median voter schemes [J].
Barberà, S ;
Massò, J ;
Neme, A .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1999, 16 (02) :321-336
[7]   Individual versus group strategy-proofness: When do they coincide? [J].
Barbera, Salvador ;
Berga, Dolors ;
Moreno, Bernardo .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2010, 145 (05) :1648-1674
[8]   ON THE RATIONALE OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING [J].
Black, Duncan .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1948, 56 (01) :23-34
[9]   On random social choice functions with the tops-only property [J].
Chatterji, Shurojit ;
Zeng, Huaxia .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2018, 109 :413-435
[10]   Random dictatorship domains [J].
Chatterji, Shurojit ;
Sen, Arunava ;
Zeng, Huaxia .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2014, 86 :212-236