Topical antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical wound infections in clean and clean-contaminated surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:20
作者
Chen, Po-Jung [1 ]
Hua, Yi-Ming [2 ]
Toh, Han Siong [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lee, Mei-Chuan [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, 901 Zhonghua Rd, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Inst Clin Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[5] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Hlth & Nutr, Tainan, Taiwan
[6] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
BJS OPEN | 2021年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词
SITE INFECTION; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; NASAL CARRIERS; PREVENTION; GUIDELINE; OINTMENT; IMPACT; CARRIAGE; RATES;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zrab125
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Our results indicate that topical antibiotics did not have a benefit in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs). In addition, topical antibiotics did not result in any reduction in SSIs in different types or different phases of surgery. Background Topical antibiotics are widely prescribed as prophylaxis for surgical site infection (SSI). Despite giving high drug concentrations at local wound sites, their efficacy remains controversial. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis designed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical antibiotics with non-antibiotic agents in preventing SSI. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical antibiotics in patients with clean and clean-contaminated postsurgical wounds were included. Relevant trials published before 30 September 2020, were searched in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, without language restrictions. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSIs, presented as the event rate. The secondary outcome was the incidence of contact dermatitis (safety outcome). Data were synthesized using the random-effects model, with the results expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.). Results Thirteen RCTs were included. The incidence of SSIs and contact dermatitis showed no significant difference between topical antibiotics and non-antibiotic agents (RR 0.89, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.32 (P = 0.56, I-2 = 48 per cent); and RR 2.79, 95 per cent c.i. 0.51 to 15.19 (P = 0.24, I-2 = 0 per cent), respectively). In the subgroup analyses, a reduction in SSIs was also not observed in dermatological (RR 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.39 to 1.55; P = 0.46, I-2 = 65 per cent), ocular (RR 0.08, 95 per cent c.i. 0.00 to 1.52; P = 0.09), spinal (RR 1.34, 95 per cent c.i. 0.65 to 2.77; P = 0.43, I-2 = 0 per cent), orthopaedic (RR 0.69, 95 per cent c.i. 0.37 to 1.29; P = 0.25, I-2 = 0 per cent), or cardiothoracic surgeries (RR 1.60, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 3.25; P = 0.19). Conclusion Given the current evidence, the routine application of topical antibiotics to surgical wounds did not reduce the incidence of SSI. Further trials are needed to assess their effectiveness in high-risk surgeries or in selected patient groups.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Allegranzi Benedetta, 2016, Lancet Infect Dis, V16, pe276, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-X
[2]   The Role of Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Oculofacial Plastic Surgery A Randomized Controlled Study [J].
Ashraf, Davin C. ;
Idowu, Oluwatobi O. ;
Wang, Qinyun ;
YeEun, Tak ;
Copperman, Thomas S. ;
Tanaboonyawat, Sombat ;
Arnold, Benjamin F. ;
Oldenburg, Catherine E. ;
Vagefi, M. Reza ;
Kersten, Robert C. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 127 (12) :1747-1754
[3]   Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries [J].
Badia, J. M. ;
Casey, A. L. ;
Petrosillo, N. ;
Hudson, P. M. ;
Mitchell, S. A. ;
Crosby, C. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2017, 96 (01) :1-15
[4]   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017 [J].
Berrios, Sandra I. ;
Umscheid, Craig A. ;
Bratzler, Dale W. ;
Leas, Brian ;
Stone, Erin C. ;
Kelz, Rachel R. ;
Reinke, Caroline E. ;
Morgan, Sherry ;
Solomkin, Joseph S. ;
Mazuski, John E. ;
Dellinger, E. Patchen ;
Itani, Kamal M. F. ;
Berbari, Elie F. ;
Segreti, John ;
Parvizi, Javad ;
Blanchard, Joan ;
Allen, George ;
Kluytmans, Jan A. J. W. ;
Donlan, Rodney ;
Schecter, William P. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (08) :784-791
[5]   Preventing Surgical-Site Infections in Nasal Carriers of Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Bode, Lonneke G. M. ;
Kluytmans, Jan A. J. W. ;
Wertheim, Heiman F. L. ;
Bogaers, Diana ;
Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina M. J. E. ;
Roosendaal, Robert ;
Troelstra, Annet ;
Box, Adrienne T. A. ;
Voss, Andreas ;
van der Tweel, Ingeborg ;
van Belkum, Alex ;
Verbrugh, Henri A. ;
Vos, Margreet C. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (01) :9-17
[6]   SURGICAL WOUND-INFECTION RATES BY WOUND CLASS, OPERATIVE PROCEDURE, AND PATIENT RISK INDEX [J].
CULVER, DH ;
HORAN, TC ;
GAYNES, RP ;
MARTONE, WJ ;
JARVIS, WR ;
EMORI, TG ;
BANERJEE, SN ;
EDWARDS, JR ;
TOLSON, JS ;
HENDERSON, TS ;
HUGHES, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 91 :S152-S157
[7]   Infection prophylaxis in periorbital Mohs surgery and reconstruction: a review and update to recommendations [J].
DelMauro, Matthew A. ;
Kalberer, Danielle C. ;
Rodgers, I. Rand .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 65 (03) :323-347
[8]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[9]   Randomized clinical trial of the effect of applying ointment to surgical wounds before occlusive dressing [J].
Dixon, A. J. ;
Dixon, M. P. ;
Dixon, J. B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (08) :937-943
[10]   A comparison of postprocedural wound care treatments: Do antibiotic-based ointments improve outcomes? [J].
Draelos, Zoe D. ;
Rizer, Ronald L. ;
Trookman, Nathan S. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2011, 64 (03) :S23-S29