Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients

被引:886
作者
Eisen, HJ
Tuzcu, EM
Dorent, R
Kobashigawa, J
Mancini, D
Valantine-von Kaeppler, HA
Starling, RC
Sorensen, K
Hummel, M
Lind, JM
Abeywickrama, KH
Bernhardt, P
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Sch Med, Cardiol Sect, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Columbia Presbyterian Med Ctr, New York, NY 10032 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Skejby Univ Hosp, Aarhus, Denmark
[8] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[9] Novartis Pharmaceut, Summit, NJ USA
[10] Novartis Pharmaceut, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa022171
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Everolimus, a novel proliferation inhibitor and immunosuppressive agent, may suppress cardiac-allograft vasculopathy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing everolimus with azathioprine in recipients of a first heart transplant. METHODS: A total of 634 patients were randomly assigned to receive 1.5 mg of everolimus per day (209 patients), 3.0 mg of everolimus per day (211 patients), or 1.0 to 3.0 mg of azathioprine per kilogram of body weight per day (214 patients), in combination with cyclosporine, corticosteroids, and statins. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, graft loss or retransplantation, loss to follow-up, biopsy-proved acute rejection of grade 3A, or rejection with hemodynamic compromise. RESULTS: At six months, the percentage of patients who had reached the primary efficacy end point was significantly smaller in the group given 3.0 mg of everolimus (27.0 percent, P<0.001) and the group given 1.5 mg of everolimus (36.4 percent, P=0.03) than in the azathioprine group (46.7 percent). Intravascular ultrasonography showed that the average increase in maximal intimal thickness 12 months after transplantation was significantly smaller in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. The incidence of vasculopathy was also significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (35.7 percent, P=0.045) and the 3.0-mg group (30.4 percent, P=0.01) than in the azathioprine group (52.8 percent). The rates of cytomegalovirus infection were significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (7.7 percent, P<0.001) and the 3.0-mg group (7.6 percent, P<0.001) than in the azathioprine group (21.5 percent). Rates of bacterial infection were significantly higher in the 3.0-mg group than in the azathioprine group. Serum creatinine levels were also significantly higher in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus was more efficacious than azathioprine in reducing the severity and incidence of cardiac-allograft vasculopathy, suggesting that everolimus therapy may alleviate this serious problem.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 858
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Immunopharmacology of rapamycin [J].
Abraham, RT ;
Wiederrecht, GJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 14 :483-510
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P1448
[3]   Viral triggers of cardiac-allograft dysfunction. [J].
Avery, RK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (20) :1545-1547
[4]   CHRONIC GRAFT-REJECTION [J].
AZUMA, H ;
TILNEY, NL .
CURRENT OPINION IN IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 6 (05) :770-776
[5]  
Billingham M E, 1990, J Heart Transplant, V9, P587
[6]  
Costanzo MR, 1998, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL, V17, P744
[7]  
COSTANZONORDIN MR, 1992, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL, V11, pS90
[8]  
*EUR AG EV MED PRO, 1997, NOT GUID GOOD CLIN P
[9]   Noninvasive assessment of transplant-associated arteriosclerosis [J].
Fang, JC ;
Rocco, T ;
Jarcho, J ;
Ganz, P ;
Mudge, GH .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1998, 135 (06) :980-987
[10]   Effect of vitamins C and E on progression of transplant-associated arteriosclerosis: a randomised trial [J].
Fang, JC ;
Kinlay, S ;
Beltrame, J ;
Hikiti, H ;
Wainstein, M ;
Behrendt, D ;
Suh, J ;
Frei, B ;
Mudge, GH ;
Selwyn, AP ;
Ganz, P .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9312) :1108-1113