Clinical predictors of poor outcomes among patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Europe

被引:43
|
作者
Lanas, A. [1 ]
Aabakken, L. [2 ]
Fonseca, J. [3 ]
Mungan, Z. A. [4 ]
Papatheodoridis, G. V. [5 ]
Piessevaux, H. [6 ]
Cipolletta, L. [7 ]
Nuevo, J. [8 ]
Tafalla, M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, CS CIBERehd 1, Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Hosp Garcia Orta, CiiEM Inst Super Ciencias Saude Egas Moniz, Serv Gastroenterol, Almada, Portugal
[4] Istanbul Univ, Dept Gastroenterohepatol, Istanbul Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 2, Hippokrat Hosp Athens, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
[6] Clin Univ St Luc, Serv Gastroenterol, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[7] Maresca Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Torre Del Greco, Italy
[8] AstraZeneca, Epidemiol Unit, Madrid, Spain
关键词
HOSPITAL STAY; MORTALITY; HEMORRHAGE; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; TRENDS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04651.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common medical emergency associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in endoscopic and pharmacological treatment during the past two decades, the incidence of mortality associated with NVUGIB has remained relatively constant. Aim To report outcomes and predictive factors for bleeding continuation/re-bleeding and mortality of NVUGIB in clinical practice in different European countries. Methods This observational, retrospective cohort study (NCT00797641; ENERGIB) was conducted in Belgium, Greece, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Spain and Turkey. Eligible patients were hospitalised (new admissions or inpatients), presenting with overt NVUGIB with endoscopy from 1 October to 30 November, 2008. Patients were managed according to routine care, and data regarding bleeding continuation/re-bleeding, pharmacological treatment, surgery and mortality during 30-days after the initial bleed were collected. A multivariate analysis of clinical factors predictive of poor outcomes was conducted. Results Overall, 2660 patients (64.7% men; mean age 67.7 years) were evaluable. Significant differences across countries in bleeding continuation/re-bleeding (range: 9-15.8%) or death (2.5-8%) at 30 days were explained by clinical factors (number of comorbidities, age > 65 years, history of bleeding ulcers, in-hospital bleeding, type of lesion or type of concomitant medication). Other factors (country, size of hospital, profile of team managing the event, or endoscopic/pharmacological therapy received) did not affect these outcomes. Similar predictors were observed in patients with high-risk stigmata. Conclusion Differences in the outcomes of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in clinical practice across some European countries are explained mainly by patient-related factors, and not by management factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1225 / 1233
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A 77-year-old man with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Fortinsky, Kyle J.
    Stall, Nathan M.
    Barkun, Alan N.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (05) : 363 - 365
  • [42] Prealbumin and D-dimer as Prognostic Indicators for Rebleeding in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Yue, Wenjie
    Liu, Yi
    Jiang, Weiru
    Huang, Jianping
    Liu, Jie
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2021, 66 (06) : 1949 - 1956
  • [43] Successful Endoscopic Hemostasis Is a Protective Factor for Rebleeding and Mortality in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Han, Yong Jae
    Cha, Jae Myung
    Park, Jae Hyun
    Jeon, Jung Won
    Shin, Hyun Phil
    Joo, Kwang Ro
    Lee, Joung Il
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2016, 61 (07) : 2011 - 2018
  • [44] Outcomes and predictors of in-hospital mortality among cirrhotic patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in upper Egypt
    Morsy, Khairy H.
    Ghaliony, Mohamed A. A.
    Mohammed, Hamdy S.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 25 (06): : 707 - 713
  • [45] Three Simple Parameters on Admission to the Emergency Department are Predictors for Endoscopic Intervention in Patients with Suspected Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Acehan, Fatih
    Karsavuranoglu, Buket
    Kalkan, Cagdas
    Aslan, Meryem
    Altiparmak, Emin
    Ates, Ihsan
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 66 (02): : 64 - 73
  • [46] Overt gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cancer: Clinical characteristics and outcomes
    Kerbage, Anthony
    Hamadeh, Najlaa
    Hashash, Jana G.
    Rockey, Don
    Barada, Kassem
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 368 (04): : 346 - 354
  • [47] Updates on management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Awadalla, Mohanad S.
    Desimone, Michael
    Wassef, Wahid
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 35 (06) : 517 - 523
  • [48] Endoscopic management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Canamares-Orbis, Pablo
    Chan, Francis K. L.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 42-43
  • [49] Advances in management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Holzwanger, Erik Aron
    Mahmoud, Mohamed
    Wassef, Wahid
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 34 (06) : 436 - 443
  • [50] Outcomes and Role of Urgent Endoscopy in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nonvariceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Cho, Soo-Han
    Lee, Yoon-Seon
    Kim, Youn-Jung
    Sohn, Chang Hwan
    Ahn, Shin
    Seo, Dong-Woo
    Kim, Won Young
    Lee, Jae Ho
    Lim, Kyoung Soo
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 16 (03) : 370 - 377