Explainable Predictions of Renal Cell Carcinoma with Interpretable Tree Ensembles from Contrast-enhanced CT Images

被引:1
作者
Han, Fuchang [1 ]
Liao, Shenghui [1 ]
Wu, Renzhong [1 ]
Liu, Shu [1 ]
Zhao, Yuqian [1 ]
Xie, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
来源
2021 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN) | 2021年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
renal cell carcinoma; explainable predictions; Shapley additive explanations; decision curve analysis; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; CALIBRATION; IMPACT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9534147
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is critical in automated clinical decision-support system. Existing state-of-the-art methods focus on designing complex machine learning models for high identification accuracy; especially, deep neural networks improve the prediction accuracy. Such designs ignore the explainability of models, and their "black box" nature is a barrier to model trust. In addition, little attention has been paid to evaluating clinical utility. To explain model predictions and evaluate risks and benefits, this paper introduces the explainable machine learning predictions that incorporate the balancing of risks and benefits of treatment to RCC prediction models. The proposed explainable network is based on tree ensembles with four improvements: (1) A multiscale feature extraction module, obtaining comprehensive radiomic features; (2) An attribute optimization module based on Chi-square test, guiding the network to focus on useful information at variables; (3) Appending a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) module to the framework to automatically and efficiently interpret the prediction of the models; And (4) a decision curve analysis (DCA) module is performed for the clinical utility evaluation. By integrating the above improvements in series, the models' performances are gradually enhanced. By the comparison of different tree ensembles-based algorithms, our study finds the random forest (RF) and extra trees (ET) classifier can be valuable diagnosis tools for explainable RCC predictions. To demonstrate the generalizability, our tree ensembles-based models achieve higher accuracies than the state-of-the-art pretrained deep models with fine-tuned parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of recurrent renal cell carcinoma in contralateral kidney
    Kawata, N
    Igarashi, T
    Ichinose, T
    Hirakata, H
    Hachiya, T
    Takimoto, Y
    Ogawa, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) : 325 - 328
  • [32] Visualization rate of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and conventional ultrasound for pseudocapsule of renal cell carcinoma
    Yang, Bin
    Fu, Ninghuan
    Ge, Jingping
    Shen, Dejuan
    Meng, Qingxing
    Liu, Ping
    SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ESSAYS, 2010, 5 (14): : 1852 - 1855
  • [33] Papillary renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-A diagnostic performance study
    Mueller-Peltzer, K.
    de Figueiredo, G. Negrao
    Graf, T.
    Ruebenthaler, J.
    Clevert, D-A
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2019, 71 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [34] Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Cong
    Yu, Chong
    Yang, Fang
    Yang, Guang
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (07) : 6343 - 6350
  • [35] Renal Cell Carcinoma and Renal Angiomyolipoma Differential Diagnosis With Real-time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography
    Xu, Zuo-Feng
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    Xie, Xiao-Yan
    Liu, Guang-Jian
    Zheng, Yan-Ling
    Lu, Ming-De
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (05) : 709 - 717
  • [36] Comparative diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Ping Zhao
    Jianing Zhu
    Lanke Wang
    Nan Li
    Xinghua Zhang
    Jinfeng Li
    Yukun Luo
    Qiuyang Li
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 3766 - 3774
  • [37] Comparative diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Zhao, Ping
    Zhu, Jianing
    Wang, Lanke
    Li, Nan
    Zhang, Xinghua
    Li, Jinfeng
    Luo, Yukun
    Li, Qiuyang
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (05) : 3766 - 3774
  • [38] Fractal Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced CT Images to Predict Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sunitinib
    Hayano, Koichi
    Yoshida, Hiroyuki
    Zhu, Andrew X.
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (08) : 1996 - 2003
  • [39] Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography with Unenhanced Sonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignancy in Complex Cystic Renal Masses
    Quaia, Emilio
    Bertolotto, Michele
    Cioffi, Vincenzo
    Rossi, Alexia
    Baratella, Elisa
    Pizzolato, Riccardo
    Cova, Maria Assunta
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (04) : 1239 - 1249
  • [40] Renal cell carcinoma T staging: Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Fateh, Salah M.
    Arkawazi, Lusan A.
    Tahir, Soran H.
    Rashid, Rezheen J.
    Rahman, Dalshad H.
    Aghaways, Ismaeel
    Kakamad, Fahmi H.
    Salih, Abdulwahid M.
    Bapir, Rawa
    Fakhralddin, Saman S.
    Fattah, Fattah H.
    Abdalla, Berun A.
    Mohammed, Shvan H.
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (02)