Budget impact of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in the United States

被引:0
作者
Milev, Sandra [1 ]
Pohl, Gerhardt [2 ]
Sun, Ariel [1 ]
Mason, Oksana [2 ]
Njuguna, Nancy [2 ]
Loo, Li Shen [2 ]
机构
[1] Evidera, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
AMERICAN MIGRAINE; EPISODIC MIGRAINE; PREVALENCE; BURDEN; UBROGEPANT; DISABILITY; HEADACHE; ADULTS; COSTS;
D O I
10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1714
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Three novel acute treatments for migraine-lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant-were approved by the FDA in 2019 and 2020 for adults with migraine with and without aura. American Headache Society guidance recommends that these novel acute treatments be considered for patients who are contraindicated to or fail to respond or tolerate oral triptans, the current standard of acute care. OBJECTIVE: To estimate, from a US commercial plan perspective, the budget impact of adding lasmiditan as an option to a formulary that already includes ubrogepant and rimegepant. METHODS: Epidemiologic data were drawn from US Census data, the American Migraine Prevalence and Preventive study, and the first wave of the OVERCOME US survey, a web-based survey that included 21,000 patients with migraine. A model with a 3-year time horizon was built assuming that demand for the novel acute treatments would not vary based on whether lasmiditan is included in the formulary. The model examined a variety of populations, in particular beneficiaries with previous use of 1 or more oral triptans or contraindicated to triptans and beneficiaries with previous use of 2 or more oral triptans or contraindicated to triptans. Primary outcomes were the incremental differences in total cost and average cost per member per month (PMPM) between scenarios with and without lasmiditan. One-way sensitivity analyses with model parameters that were varied by plus or minus 15% were conducted to assess the effect of key parameters on the incremental total cost over 3 years. RESULTS: The addition of lasmiditan to a formulary that already includes ubrogepant and rimegepant resulted in a total savings of -$927,657 (-1.5% compared with the scenario without lasmiditan) over a 3-year time horizon in the population with previous history of using 1 or more oral triptans or contraindicated to a triptan. In the population with previous history of using 2 or more oral triptans or contraindicated, the addition of lasmiditan resulted in a total budget impact of -$466,518 (-1.3%) over a 3-year time horizon. Most of the cost savings was attributable to reductions in drug acquisition cost. Savings in total costs resulted in average incremental cost per PMPM of -0.03 and -$0.01, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of lasmiditan to the formulary as a novel acute treatment option for migraine alongside ubrogepant and rimegepant resulted in lower budget impact on a 3-year time horizon from a US commercial payer's perspective. This result is important to US commercial payers as they seek to incorporate the emerging novel acute treatments for migraine into their benefit designs.
引用
收藏
页码:1714 / 1723
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] The effectiveness and value of novel acute treatments for migraine
    Agboola, Foluso
    Atlas, Steven J.
    Touchette, Daniel R.
    Borrelli, Eric P.
    Rind, David M.
    Pearson, Steven D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2020, 26 (11) : 1456 - 1462
  • [2] Long-Term Safety Evaluation of Ubrogepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Phase 3, Randomized, 52-Week Extension Trial
    Ailani, Jessica
    Lipton, Richard B.
    Hutchinson, Susan
    Knievel, Kerry
    Lu, Kaifeng
    Butler, Matthew
    Yu, Sung Yun
    Finnegan, Michelle
    Severt, Lawrence
    Trugman, Joel M.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (01): : 141 - 152
  • [3] American Migraine Foundation, 2018, LIV MIGR
  • [4] Atlas S, 2020, ACUTE TREATMENTS MIG
  • [5] Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS)
    Blumenfeld, A. M.
    Varon, S. F.
    Wilcox, T. K.
    Buse, D. C.
    Kawata, A. K.
    Manack, A.
    Goadsby, P. J.
    Lipton, R. B.
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2011, 31 (03) : 301 - 315
  • [6] Direct and Indirect Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Migraine Patients in the United States
    Bonafede, Machaon
    Sapra, Sandhya
    Shah, Neel
    Tepper, Stewart
    Cappell, Katherine
    Desai, Pooja
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2018, 58 (05): : 700 - 714
  • [7] Interim results of a prospective, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study of the long-term safety and efficacy of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine (the GLADIATOR study)
    Brandes, Jan Lewis
    Klise, Suzanne
    Krege, John H.
    Case, Michael
    Khanna, Rashna
    Vasudeva, Raghavendra
    Raskin, Joel
    Pearlman, Eric M.
    Kudrow, David
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2019, 39 (11) : 1343 - 1357
  • [8] Brandes JL, CEPHALALGIA REPORTS, DOI [10.1177/2515816320958176, DOI 10.1177/2515816320958176]
  • [9] The Prevalence and Burden of Migraine and Severe Headache in the United States: Updated Statistics From Government Health Surveillance Studies
    Burch, Rebecca C.
    Loder, Stephen
    Loder, Elizabeth
    Smitherman, Todd A.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2015, 55 (01): : 21 - 34
  • [10] Are Episodic and Chronic Migraine One Disease or Two?
    Burshtein, Reuben
    Burshtein, Aaron
    Burshtein, Joshua
    Rosen, Noah
    [J]. CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2015, 19 (12)