A Comparative Study of Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

被引:5
作者
Shrey, Shruti [1 ]
Singam, Amol [1 ]
Latwal, Basant Singh [1 ]
Nagpure, Pratibha [1 ]
Ayushma [1 ]
机构
[1] JNMC, AVBRH, Dept Anaesthesiol, Wardha 442001, Maharashtra, India
来源
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS | 2020年 / 9卷 / 04期
关键词
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Ropivacaine; Bupivacaine; PAIN RELIEF; LIDOCAINE; INSTILLATION; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2020/47
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Every surgical procedure inflicts pain during the procedure which also continues in the post-operative period as post-operative pain. Intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been used to reduce postoperative pain and to decrease the need for postoperative analgesics. We wanted to compare intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS After obtaining ethical committee's clearance and informed consent, sixty patients, aged 20-60 years, of either gender, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I to II scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included and categorized into two groups (n=30). Group B patients received 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine intraperitoneally after cholecystectomy and Group R patients received 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine intraperitoneally after cholecystectomy. Mean duration of postoperative analgesia and number of doses of rescue analgesic required were observed. Patients were assessed at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18 and 24 hours postoperatively with respect to quality of analgesia (VAS), hemodynamic parameters and side effects. RESULTS Mean Time for first rescue analgesic requirement was 148.04 +/- 53.47 min in group B and 295.38 +/- 74.15 in group R and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.0001). In group R 17 (56.6%) patients did not require any rescue analgesic throughout the study period as compared to 8 (26.6%) patients in group B. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant. (p=0.019). A lower VAS score was observed in group R as compared to group B, with statistically significant difference at 2, 4 and 8 hours respectively. (p=0.001, 0.003 and 0.032). CONCLUSIONS 0.75% ropivacaine is a better alternative to 0.5% bupivacaine when given intraperitoneally for management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia as it prolongs the duration of analgesia, provides a better quality of analgesia till 8 hours postoperatively, with lesser demand and requirement of rescue analgesic in the postoperative period, and has lesser side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 205
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFECT OF INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE ON PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    SCHEININ, B
    KELLOKUMPU, I
    LINDGREN, L
    HAGLUND, C
    ROSENBERG, PH
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 (02) : 195 - 198
  • [42] Intraperitoneal nebulization versus intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine for postoperative pain management following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    Kumar, Rajeev
    Nath, Soumya Shankar
    Agarwal, Anil
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 72 (04) : 357 - 365
  • [43] Comparative Study of 0.5% Bupivacaine, 0.5% Ropivacaine, and 0.75% Ropivacaine With Fentanyl as a Continuous Intraoperative Epidural Infusion on Post-operative Analgesia
    Pandey, Shashaank
    Borkar, Sharmila
    Monteiro, Jovita M.
    Mathew, Sherin
    Vernekar, Divya
    Barreto, Ombretta
    Gopinathan, Pillai Arun
    Pillai, Vivek G.
    Kishan, A. Vijeth
    Joute, Isaac Lalbiekthang
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [44] Comparison of racemic bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and levo-bupivacaine for pediatric caudal anesthesia: Effects on postoperative analgesia and motor block
    Ivani, G
    DeNegri, P
    Conio, A
    Grossetti, R
    Vitale, P
    Vercellino, C
    Gagliardi, F
    Eksborg, S
    Lonnqvist, PA
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (02) : 157 - 161
  • [45] Comparative efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine infiltrative analgesia in otoplasty
    Kakagia, D
    Fotiadis, S
    Tripsiannis, G
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 54 (04) : 409 - 411
  • [46] Peritrocal and Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial
    Cha, Su Man
    Kang, Hyun
    Baek, Chong Wha
    Jung, Yong Hun
    Koo, Gill Hoi
    Kim, Beom Gyu
    Choi, Yoo Shin
    Cha, Seong Jae
    Cha, Young Joo
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 175 (02) : 251 - 258
  • [47] Comparative analysis of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for infiltration analgesia for bilateral breast surgery
    Fayman, M
    Beeton, A
    Potgieter, E
    Becker, PJ
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 27 (02) : 100 - 103
  • [48] A prospective randomised controlled study for evaluation of high-volume low-concentration intraperitoneal bupivacaine for post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy analgesia
    Jain, Shruti
    Nazir, Nazia
    Singh, Shipra
    Sharma, Suveer
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [49] Comparison of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with bupivacaine and ropivacaine as adjuncts for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomies
    Sinha, Shradha
    Palta, Sanjeev
    Saroa, Richa
    Prasad, Abhishek
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 60 (04) : 264 - 269
  • [50] Comparative Analysis of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine for Infiltration Analgesia for Bilateral Breast Surgery
    Moshe Fayman
    Anthony Beeton
    Estelle Potgieter
    Piet J. Becker
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2003, 27 : 100 - 103