Strain-softening model evaluating geobelt-clay interaction validated by laboratory tests of sensor-enabled geobelts

被引:14
作者
Cui, Xin-zhuang [1 ]
Wang, Yi-lin [1 ]
Liu, Kai-Wen [2 ]
Li, Jun [1 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Su, Jun-wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Jinan 250061, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab High Speed Railway Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
关键词
strain-softening model; geobelt-clay interaction; pullout test; sensor-enabled geobelts; numerical solution; GEOGRID-SOIL INTERACTION; PULL-OUT RESPONSE; ENGINEERING PROPERTIES; REINFORCEMENT; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; GEOSYNTHETICS; INTERFACE; STRENGTH; CONCRETE;
D O I
10.1139/cgj-2018-0560
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The interaction between geosynthetics and soil is vital for the stability and the bearing capacity of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. This contact behavior between geosynthetics and granular soils has been extensively studied in the literature while there is scarcity of it related to geosynthetics and cohesive soils particularly with softening responses. This paper presents a strain-softening model of geobelt-clay interaction based on direct shear test results under two compaction degrees. A theoretical model for evaluating the pullout behavior of a geobelt is proposed by employing the strain-softening model verified by direct shear tests and a hyperbolic model capturing the stress-strain curves of a geobelt calibrated by uniaxial tensile tests. The proposed model is numerically solved and validated by pullout tests. A kind of sensor-enabled geobelt (SEGB) was adopted in all the aforementioned tests. Both test and numerical results show an overall softening trend in terms of front pull-out force versus displacement. Generally, the model proposed can give reasonably good agreement between calculations and test data during the whole pull-out range. Also, the strain distributions measured by SEGBs demonstrate the working process during the pullout tests, which makes SEGBs a potentially new choice for the strain measurements of in-soil geobelts.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 365
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Design of geosynthetic-reinforced slopes in cohesive backfills [J].
Abd, Akram H. ;
Utili, Stefano .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2017, 45 (06) :627-641
[2]   Physical and analytical modelling of geosynthetic strip pull-out behaviour [J].
Abdelouhab, Abdelkader ;
Dias, Daniel ;
Freitag, Nicolas .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2010, 28 (01) :44-53
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ASTM D6706-01
[4]   Modeling of soil-woven geotextile interface behavior from direct shear test results [J].
Anubhav ;
Basudhar, P. K. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2010, 28 (04) :403-408
[5]  
ASTM, 2017, D5321 ASTM
[6]  
ASTM, 2007, D663701 ASTM
[7]   Insights into geogrid-soil interaction using a transparent granular soil [J].
Bathurst, R. J. ;
Ezzein, F. M. .
GEOTECHNIQUE LETTERS, 2017, 7 (02) :179-183
[8]   Interface Shear Strengths Between Geosynthetics and Clayey Soils [J].
Chai J.-C. ;
Saito A. .
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2016, 2 (3)
[9]   Reinforcement and mud-pumping benefits of geosynthetics in railway tracks: Model tests [J].
Chawla, Sowmiya ;
Shahu, J. T. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2016, 44 (03) :366-380
[10]   Mitigating the bridge end bump problem: A case study of a new approach slab system with geosynthetic reinforced soil foundation [J].
Chen, Qiming ;
Abu-Farsakh, Murad .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2016, 44 (01) :39-50