What is the value of wild animal welfare for restoration ecology?

被引:8
作者
Capozzelli, Jane F. [1 ]
Hecht, Luke [1 ,2 ]
Halsey, Samniqueka J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Wild Anim Initiat, POB 43568, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Univ Durham, Dept Biosci, Stockton Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[3] Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Resources, 1111 Rollins St, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
biotic integrity; ecosystem health; environmental stewardship; land ethic; rewilding; CONSERVATION; FISH;
D O I
10.1111/rec.13114
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The restoration community continues to discuss what constitutes good environmental stewardship. One area of tension is the extent to which the well-being of wild animals should inform restoration efforts. We discuss three ways that the perspective of wild animal welfare can augment restoration ecology: strengthening people's relationship with nature, reinforcing biotic integrity, and reducing mechanistic uncertainty. The animal welfare movement elevates sentient animals as stakeholders and explores how environmental context directly impacts the well-being of individuals. Viewing wild animals through this lens may encourage people to think and act with empathy and altruism. Second, we incorporate animal welfare into the concept of biotic integrity for ecological and ethical reasons. Restoring ecosystem processes may enhance animal welfare, and vice versa. Alternatively, there may be a trade-off between these factors, requiring local decision-makers to prioritize between restoring ecosystem function and promoting individuals' well-being. We conclude by discussing how welfare can impact population recovery, thereby adding insights about mechanisms underpinning restoration objectives. Ultimately, restoration ecologists and proponents of wild animal welfare could enjoy a productive union.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 270
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A Universal Animal Welfare Framework for Zoos [J].
Kagan, Ron ;
Carter, Scott ;
Allard, Stephanie .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2015, 18 :S1-S10
[32]   Pragmatic animal welfare is independent of feelings [J].
Arlinghaus, Robert ;
Cowx, Ian G. ;
Key, Brian ;
Diggles, Ben K. ;
Schwab, Alexander ;
Cooke, Steven J. ;
Skiftesvik, Anne Berit ;
Browman, Howard I. .
SCIENCE, 2020, 370 (6513) :180-180
[33]   From landscape ecology to forest landscape restoration [J].
Mansourian, Stephanie .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2021, 36 (08) :2443-2452
[34]   Do or do not. There is no try in restoration ecology [J].
Lortie, Christopher J. ;
St John, Julie ;
Spangler, Will .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2019, 27 (05) :955-958
[35]   Evolution, Ecology and Management of Wild Boar and Deer [J].
Perez-Gonzalez, Javier .
ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (18)
[36]   Editorial: Nutritional ecology of wild and managed bees [J].
Ghosh, Sampat ;
Wang, Ying ;
Jung, Chuleui .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
[37]   Bringing population ecology back to wild bees [J].
Dorian, Nicholas N. ;
McCarthy, Max W. ;
Crone, Elizabeth E. .
ECOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (09)
[38]   The Political Salience of Animal Protection in the Republic of Ireland (2011-2020): What Do Irish Political Parties Pledge on Animal Welfare and Wildlife Conservation? [J].
Hus, Annick ;
Mcculloch, Steven P. .
ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (24)
[39]   What motivates ecological restoration? [J].
Hagger, Valerie ;
Dwyer, John ;
Wilson, Kerrie .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2017, 25 (05) :832-843
[40]   Editorial: Animal Welfare-Volume II: Using Bio-sensing Devices to Assess Farm Animal Welfare [J].
Brijs, Jeroen ;
Fahlman, Andreas ;
Fore, Martin ;
Manteca, Xavier .
FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13