Developmental differences in behavioral and event-related brain responses associated with response preparation and inhibition in a go/nogo task

被引:170
作者
Jonkman, LM
Lansbergen, M
Stauder, JEA
机构
[1] Univ Maastricht, Fac Psychol, Dept Neurocognit, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Psychopharmacol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
child development; response inhibition; event-related potentials; nogo-N2; nogo P3; contingent negative variation;
D O I
10.1111/1469-8986.00075
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study investigated developmental trends in response inhibition and preparation by studying behavior and event-related brain activity in a cued go/nogo task, administered to nine-year-old children and young adults. Hits, false alarms, inattention, and impulsivity scores and ERP measures of inhibition (fronto-central nogo-N2 and P3), target selection (parietal go-nogo P3 difference), and response preparation (contingent negative variation; CNV) were collected. Higher false alarm and impulsivity scores and the absence of the fronto-central nogo P3 all suggest a developmental lag in response inhibition in children. A developmental lag in sustained attention processes was suggested by worse target detection and larger parietal target/nontarget P3 effects in children. Cue orientation and response preparation processes were respectively measured by early and late CNV activity. Children displayed smaller early CNV amplitudes at fronto-central locations, but mature late CNV. The smaller early CNV activity might indicate inefficient cue-orientation processes caused by incomplete frontal lobe development.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 761
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Achenbach T.M., 1991, INTEGRATIVE GUIDE 19
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1994, J Clin Neurophysiol, V11, P111
  • [3] AYDIN C, 1987, ADV BIOL PSYCHIAT, V16, P178
  • [4] Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition?
    Bruin, KJ
    Wijers, AA
    van Staveren, ASJ
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (09) : 1660 - 1671
  • [5] A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a Go-No-Go task
    Casey, BJ
    Trainor, RJ
    Orendi, JL
    Schubert, AB
    Nystrom, LE
    Giedd, JN
    Castellanos, FX
    Haxby, JV
    Noll, DC
    Cohen, JD
    Forman, SD
    Dahl, RE
    Rapoport, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (06) : 835 - 847
  • [6] DIPELLEGRINO G, 1991, BRAIN, V114, P951
  • [7] DUMAISHUBER C, 1992, J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V6, P225
  • [8] ERP components in Go Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition
    Falkenstein, M
    Hoormann, J
    Hohnsbein, J
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) : 267 - 291
  • [9] A robust assessment of the NoGo-anteriorisation of P300 microstates in a cued continuous performance test
    Fallgatter, AJ
    Brandeis, D
    Strik, WK
    [J]. BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 1997, 9 (04) : 295 - 302
  • [10] The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control
    Fallgatter, AJ
    Strik, WK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 32 (03) : 233 - 238