Developmental differences in behavioral and event-related brain responses associated with response preparation and inhibition in a go/nogo task

被引:171
作者
Jonkman, LM
Lansbergen, M
Stauder, JEA
机构
[1] Univ Maastricht, Fac Psychol, Dept Neurocognit, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Psychopharmacol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
child development; response inhibition; event-related potentials; nogo-N2; nogo P3; contingent negative variation;
D O I
10.1111/1469-8986.00075
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study investigated developmental trends in response inhibition and preparation by studying behavior and event-related brain activity in a cued go/nogo task, administered to nine-year-old children and young adults. Hits, false alarms, inattention, and impulsivity scores and ERP measures of inhibition (fronto-central nogo-N2 and P3), target selection (parietal go-nogo P3 difference), and response preparation (contingent negative variation; CNV) were collected. Higher false alarm and impulsivity scores and the absence of the fronto-central nogo P3 all suggest a developmental lag in response inhibition in children. A developmental lag in sustained attention processes was suggested by worse target detection and larger parietal target/nontarget P3 effects in children. Cue orientation and response preparation processes were respectively measured by early and late CNV activity. Children displayed smaller early CNV amplitudes at fronto-central locations, but mature late CNV. The smaller early CNV activity might indicate inefficient cue-orientation processes caused by incomplete frontal lobe development.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 761
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Achenbach T.M., 1991, INTEGRATIVE GUIDE 19
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, J Clin Neurophysiol, V11, P111
[3]  
AYDIN C, 1987, ADV BIOL PSYCHIAT, V16, P178
[4]   Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? [J].
Bruin, KJ ;
Wijers, AA ;
van Staveren, ASJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (09) :1660-1671
[5]   A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a Go-No-Go task [J].
Casey, BJ ;
Trainor, RJ ;
Orendi, JL ;
Schubert, AB ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Giedd, JN ;
Castellanos, FX ;
Haxby, JV ;
Noll, DC ;
Cohen, JD ;
Forman, SD ;
Dahl, RE ;
Rapoport, JL .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (06) :835-847
[6]  
DIPELLEGRINO G, 1991, BRAIN, V114, P951
[7]  
DUMAISHUBER C, 1992, J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V6, P225
[8]   ERP components in Go Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition [J].
Falkenstein, M ;
Hoormann, J ;
Hohnsbein, J .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :267-291
[9]   A robust assessment of the NoGo-anteriorisation of P300 microstates in a cued continuous performance test [J].
Fallgatter, AJ ;
Brandeis, D ;
Strik, WK .
BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 1997, 9 (04) :295-302
[10]   The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control [J].
Fallgatter, AJ ;
Strik, WK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 32 (03) :233-238