A prediction model for underestimation of invasive breast cancer after a biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: based on 2892 biopsies and 589 invasive cancers

被引:32
作者
Meurs, Claudia J. C. [1 ]
van Rosmalen, Joost [2 ]
Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B. E. [3 ]
ter Braak, Bert P. M. [4 ]
de Munck, Linda [5 ]
Siesling, Sabine [5 ]
Westenend, Pieter J. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] CMAnalyzing, Gounodstr 16, NL-6904 HC Zevenaar, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Biostat, Wytemaweg 80, NL-3015 CN Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Albert Schweitzer Hosp, Dept Surg, POB 444, NL-3300 AK Dordrecht, Netherlands
[4] Albert Schweitzer Hosp, Dept Radiol, POB 444, NL-3300 AK Dordrecht, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res, POB 19079, NL-3501 DB Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Lab Pathol Dordrecht, Karel Lotsyweg 145, NL-3318 AL Dordrecht, Netherlands
[7] Reg Screening Org South West Netherlands, Maasstadweg 12, NL-3079 DZ Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CORE-NEEDLE-BIOPSY; LYMPH-NODE BIOPSY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; NATURAL-HISTORY; RISK; NETHERLANDS; METASTASIS; NOMOGRAM; DISEASE; GRADE;
D O I
10.1038/s41416-018-0276-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patients with a biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) might be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at excision, a phenomenon known as underestimation. Patients with DCIS are treated based on the risk of underestimation or progression to invasive cancer. The aim of our study was to expand the knowledge on underestimation and to develop a prediction model. METHODS: Population-based data were retrieved from the Dutch Pathology Registry and the Netherlands Cancer Registry for DCIS between January 2011 and June 2012. RESULTS: Of 2892 DCIS biopsies, 21% were underestimated invasive breast cancers. In multivariable analysis, risk factors were high-grade DCIS (odds ratio (OR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-1.95), a palpable tumour (OR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.76-2.81), a BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) score 5 (OR 2.36, 95% CI: 1.80-3.09) and a suspected invasive component at biopsy (OR 3.84, 95% CI: 2.69-5.46). The predicted risk for underestimation ranged from 9.5 to 80.2%, with a median of 14.7%. Of the 596 invasive cancers, 39% had unfavourable features. CONCLUSIONS: The risk for an underestimated diagnosis of invasive breast cancer after a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS is considerable. With our prediction model, the individual risk of underestimation can be calculated based on routinely available preoperatively known risk factors (https://www.evidencio.com/models/show/1074).
引用
收藏
页码:1155 / 1162
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, DUTCH BREAST CANC GU
  • [2] Ductal Carcinoma in Situ at Core-Needle Biopsy: Meta-Analysis of Underestimation and Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer
    Brennan, Meagan E.
    Turner, Robin M.
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    French, James R.
    Macaskill, Petra
    Houssami, Nehmat
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (01) : 119 - 128
  • [3] Brierley J. D, 2009, TNM CLASSIFICATION M, P181
  • [4] Casparie M, 2007, CELL ONCOL, V29, P19
  • [5] Ductal carcinoma insitu: Is core needle biopsy ever enough?
    Caswell-Smith, Peter
    Wall, Madeleine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 61 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [6] A Simple Model to Assess the Probability of Invasion in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Diagnosed by Needle Biopsy
    Coufal, Oldrich
    Selingerova, Iveta
    Vrtjlova, Pavlina
    Krsicka, Petr
    Gabrielova, Lucie
    Fabian, Pavel
    Stiskalova, Katerina
    Schneiderova, Monika
    Poprach, Alexandr
    Justan, Ivan
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [7] Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ - The LORD study
    Elshof, Lotte E.
    Tryfonidis, Konstantinos
    Slaets, Leen
    van Leeuwen-Stok, A. Elise
    Skinner, Victoria P.
    Dif, Nicolas
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Bijker, Nina
    Rutgers, Emiel J. Th.
    Wesseling, Jelle
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (12) : 1497 - 1510
  • [8] The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast:: a review
    Erbas, B
    Provenzan, E
    Armes, J
    Gertig, D
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 97 (02) : 135 - 144
  • [9] Francis A., 2014, PHASE 3 TRIAL SURG V
  • [10] Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial
    Francis, Adele
    Thomas, Jeremy
    Fallowfield, Lesley
    Wallis, Matthew
    Bartlett, John M. S.
    Brookes, Cassandra
    Roberts, Tracy
    Pirrie, Sarah
    Gaunt, Claire
    Young, Jennie
    Billingham, Lucinda
    Dodwell, David
    Hanby, Andrew
    Pinder, Sarah E.
    Evans, Andrew
    Reed, Malcolm
    Jenkins, Valerie
    Matthews, Lucy
    Wilcox, Maggie
    Fairbrother, Patricia
    Bowden, Sarah
    Rea, Daniel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (16) : 2296 - 2303