Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study

被引:763
作者
Froehlich, F
Wietlisbach, V
Gonvers, JJ
Burnand, B
Vader, JP
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, CHUV, PMU, Dept Gastroenterol,Inst Social & Prevent Med, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Gastroenterol, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02776-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The quality of colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. To our knowledge, the impact of bowel preparation on the quality of colonoscopy has not been assessed prospectively in a large multicenter study Therefore, this study assessed the factors that determine colon-cleansing quality and the impact of cleansing quality on the technical performance and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy. Methods: Twenty-one centers from 11 countries participated in this prospective observational study. Colon-cleansing quality was assessed on a 5-point scale and was categorized on 3 levels. The clinical indication for colonoscopy, diagnoses, and technical parameters related to colonoscopy were recorded. Results: A total of 5832 patients were included in the study (48.7% men, mean age 57.6 [15.9] years). Cleansing quality was lower in elderly patients and in patients in the hospital. Procedures in poorly prepared patients were longer, more difficult, and more often incomplete. The detection of polyps of any size depended on cleansing quality: odds ratio (OR) 1.73: 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.28, 2.36] for intermediate-quality compared with low-quality preparation; and OR 1.46: 95% CI [1.11, 1.93] for high-quality compared with low-quality preparation. For polyps > 10 mm in size, corresponding ORs were 1.0 for low-quality cleansing, OR 1.83: 95% CI[1.11, 3.05] for intermediate-quality cleansing, and OR 1.72: 95% CI[1.11, 2.67] for high-quality cleansing. Cancers were not detected less frequently in the case of poor preparation. Conclusions: Cleansing quality critically determines quality, difficulty, speed, and completeness of colonoscopy, and is lower in hospitalized patients and patients with higher levels of comorbid conditions. The proportion of patients who undergo polypectomy increases with higher cleansing quality, whereas colon cancer detection does not seem to critically depend on the quality of bowel preparation.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 384
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] WHOLE GUT LAVAGE FOR COLONOSCOPY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 SOLUTIONS
    ADLER, M
    QUENON, M
    EVENADIN, D
    JEANMART, J
    VANGOSSUM, A
    BOURGEOIS, N
    CREMER, M
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1984, 30 (02) : 65 - 67
  • [2] PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING A NEW SODIUM PHOSPHATE-BISACODYL REGIMEN WITH CONVENTIONAL PEG-ES LAVAGE FOR OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION
    AFRIDI, SA
    BARTHEL, JS
    KING, PD
    PINEDA, JJ
    MARSHALL, JB
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (05) : 485 - 489
  • [3] THE DANGERS OF GOING TO BED
    ASHER, RAJ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1947, 2 (4536) : 967 - 968
  • [4] BERRY MA, 1994, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V8, P381
  • [5] The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: endoscopic findings, therapy, and complications
    Cappell, MS
    Friedel, D
    [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 86 (06) : 1253 - +
  • [6] Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy - Timing is the key!
    Church, JM
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (10) : 1223 - 1225
  • [7] PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, ENDOSCOPIC-BLINDED TRIAL COMPARING PRECOLONOSCOPY BOWEL CLEANSING METHODS
    COHEN, SM
    WEXNER, SD
    BINDEROW, SR
    NOGUERAS, JJ
    DANIEL, N
    EHRENPREIS, ED
    JENSEN, J
    BONNER, GF
    RUDERMAN, WB
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1994, 37 (07) : 689 - 696
  • [8] A randomized, prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy in children
    Dahshan, A
    Lin, CH
    Peters, J
    Thomas, R
    Tolia, V
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 94 (12) : 3497 - 3501
  • [9] DAVIS GR, 1980, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V78, P991
  • [10] DIPALMA JA, 1984, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V86, P856