The US preventive services task force: Putting evidence-based medicine to work

被引:16
作者
Grimes, DA
Atkins, D
机构
[1] Family Hlth Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] US Dept HHS, Agcy Hlth Care Policy & Res, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00003081-199806000-00013
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is a prominent example of evidence-based medicine put to work. The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services and its Canadian counterpart distill thousands of articles into easily understood guidelines for the busy clinician. Rather than dictating practice, it provides the scientific base for prevention services. The second fundamental part of evidence-based medicine is the filtering of that evidence through the clinical skill of the clinician. Only the clinician can judge the applicability of the evidence and the preferences of the woman and her family. Some common preventive practices in women's health lack a scientific basis. Others clearly work. To maximize benefit, clinicians should emphasize and encourage prevention strategies that are effective. These include cervical cytology screening, blood pressure screening, urine cultures in early pregnancy, testing for phenylketonuria, and discouraging smoking. No health program can be viewed in a vacuum. This is especially true in the managed care era. Clinicians must ask what benefit would have accrued had the same amount of time and money been spent on alternative programs. If practices with only a class C recommendation draw money and resources from other programs of proven worth (e.g., class A recommendations), then the former have a net negative impact on women's health. The Task Force report helps women, clinicians, payers, and policymakers make these important decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:332 / 342
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, NEW ENGL J MED, V321, P406
[2]   EFFECTS OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES ON PERINATAL MORBIDITY REASSESSED - REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ADVERSE PERINATAL OUTCOMES OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES-MELLITUS, DECEMBER 3-4, 1992 [J].
BLANK, A ;
GRAVE, GD ;
METZGER, BE .
DIABETES CARE, 1995, 18 (01) :127-129
[3]  
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, 1994, CAN GUID CLIN PREV H
[4]  
CARLSON KJ, 1994, ANN INTERN MED, V121, P124, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-121-2-199407150-00009
[5]  
*COLL HOM UT MON S, 1995, J OBSTET GYNECOL, V173, P1120
[6]  
ENKIN M, 1995, GUIDE EFFECTIVE CARE, P60
[7]   The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer [J].
Flood, AB ;
Wennberg, JE ;
Nease, RF ;
Fowler, FJ ;
Ding, J ;
Hynes, LM .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 11 (06) :342-349
[8]  
Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[9]  
Gordis L, 1997, J NATL CANCER I, V89, P1015, DOI 10.1093/jnci/89.14.1015
[10]   ACTUAL CAUSES OF DEATH IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
MCGINNIS, JM ;
FOEGE, WH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (18) :2207-2212