Decentralized Clearing in Financial Networks

被引:54
作者
Csoka, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Herings, P. Jean-Jacques [3 ]
机构
[1] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Corvinus Business Sch, Dept Finance, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Hungarian Acad Sci, Ctr Econ & Reg Studies, Momentum Game Theory Res Grp, H-7621 Pecs, Hungary
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Econ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
networks; bankruptcy problems; systemic risk; decentralized clearing; indivisibilities; blockchain; GAME-THEORETIC ANALYSIS; SYSTEMIC RISK; ALLOCATION METHODS; TAXATION PROBLEMS; CLAIMS PROBLEMS; CONTAGION; APPORTIONMENT; INDIVISIBILITIES; BANKRUPTCY; LIQUIDITY;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2017.2847
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We consider a situation in which agents have mutual claims on each other, summarized in a liability matrix. Agents' assets might be insufficient to satisfy their liabilities, leading to defaults. In case of default, bankruptcy rules are used to specify the way agents are going to be rationed. A clearing payment matrix is a payment matrix consistent with the prevailing bankruptcy rules that satisfies limited liability and priority of creditors. Since clearing payment matrices and the corresponding values of equity are not uniquely determined, we provide bounds on the possible levels equity can take. Unlike the existing literature, which studies centralized clearing procedures, we introduce a large class of decentralized clearing processes. We show the convergence of any such process in finitely many iterations to the least clearing payment matrix. When the unit of account is sufficiently small, all decentralized clearing processes lead essentially to the same value of equity as a centralized clearing procedure. As a policy implication, it is not necessary to collect and process all the sensitive data of all the agents simultaneously and run a centralized clearing procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:4681 / 4699
页数:19
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman ;
Tahbaz-Salehi, Alireza .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (02) :564-608
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, FAIR REPRESENTATION
[3]   QUOTA METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT [J].
BALINSKI, ML ;
YOUNG, HP .
AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 1975, 82 (07) :701-730
[4]   Fair apportionment in the view of the Venice Commission's recommendation [J].
Biro, Peter ;
Koczy, Laszlo A. ;
Sziklai, Balazs .
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2015, 77 :32-41
[5]   Flow sharing and bankruptcy games [J].
Bjorndal, Endre ;
Jornsten, Kurt .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 2010, 39 (1-2) :11-28
[6]   SHARING PROBLEM [J].
BROWN, JR .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1979, 27 (02) :324-340
[7]   Liability Concentration and Systemic Losses in Financial Networks [J].
Capponi, Agostino ;
Chen, Peng-Chu ;
Yao, David D. .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 64 (05) :1121-1134
[8]   An Axiomatic Approach to Systemic Risk [J].
Chen, Chen ;
Iyengar, Garud ;
Moallemi, Ciamac C. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (06) :1373-1388
[9]   Systematic favorability in claims problems with indivisibilities [J].
Chen, Siwei .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2015, 44 (02) :283-300
[10]   Liquidity risk and contagion [J].
Cifuentes, R ;
Ferrucci, G ;
Shin, HS .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2005, 3 (2-3) :556-566