Condition Number Estimates for Combined Potential Integral Operators in Acoustics and Their Boundary Element Discretisation

被引:68
作者
Betcke, T. [1 ]
Chandler-Wilde, S. N. [1 ]
Graham, I. G. [2 ]
Langdon, S. [1 ]
Lindner, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Math & Stat, Whiteknights RG6 6AX, Berks, England
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Math Sci, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[3] TU Chemnitz, Fak Math, D-09107 Chemnitz, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
boundary element method; Helmholtz equation; high oscillation; DIRICHLET PROBLEM; EQUATION; CONVERGENCE; SCATTERING; ERROR;
D O I
10.1002/num.20643
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
We consider the classical coupled combined field integral equation formulations for time-harmonic acoustic scattering by a sound soft bounded obstacle In recent work we have proved lower and upper bounds on the L-2 condition numbers for these formulations and also on the norms of the classical acoustic single- and double-layer potential operators These bounds to some extent make explicit the dependence of condition numbers on the wave number k, the geometry of the scatterer and the coupling parameter For example with the usual choice of coupling parameter they show that while the condition number grows like k(1/3) as k -> infinity when the scatterer is a circle or sphere, It can grow as fast as k(7/5) for a class of trapping obstacles In this article, we prove further bounds, sharpening and extending our previous results In particular, we show that there exist trapping obstacles for which the condition numbers grow as fast as exp(gamma k) for some gamma > 0 as k -> infinity through some sequence This result depends on exponential localization bounds on Laplace eigenfunctions in an ellipse that we prove in the appendix We also clarify the correct choice of coupling parameter in 2D for low k In the second part of the article, we focus on the boundary element discretisation of these operators We discuss the extent to which the bounds on the continuous operators are also satisfied by their discrete counterparts and via numerical experiments we provide supporting evidence for some of the theoretical results, both quantitative and asymptotic, indicating further which of the upper and lower bounds may be sharper (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals Inc Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 27 31-69 2011
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 69
页数:39
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Abramowitz M., 1972, HDB MATH FUNCTIONS
[2]  
Agmon Shmuel., 1982, Mathematical Notes, V29
[3]  
Amini S., 1990, Applicable Analysis, V35, P75, DOI 10.1080/00036819008839905
[4]  
AMINI S, 1993, COMPUT MECH, V13, P2
[5]   A refined Galerkin error and stability analysis for highly indefinite variational problems [J].
Banjai, L. ;
Sauter, S. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 45 (01) :37-53
[6]  
Betcke T, SIAM J NUMER A UNPUB
[7]   Surface scattering in three dimensions: an accelerated high-order solver [J].
Bruno, OP ;
Kunyansky, LA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2001, 457 (2016) :2921-2934
[8]  
BRUNO OP, 2007, COMMUNICATION
[9]   A Galerkin boundary element method for high frequency scattering by convex polygons [J].
Chandler-Wilde, S. N. ;
Langdon, S. .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 45 (02) :610-640
[10]   CONDITION NUMBER ESTIMATES FOR COMBINED POTENTIAL BOUNDARY INTEGRAL OPERATORS IN ACOUSTIC SCATTERING [J].
Chandler-Wilde, Simon N. ;
Graham, Ivan G. ;
Langdon, Stephen ;
Lindner, Marko .
JOURNAL OF INTEGRAL EQUATIONS AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 21 (02) :229-279