The role of theory in research to develop and evaluate the implementation of patient safety practices

被引:102
作者
Foy, Robbie [1 ]
Ovretveit, John [2 ]
Shekelle, Paul G. [3 ,4 ]
Pronovost, Peter J. [5 ]
Taylor, Stephanie L. [3 ,4 ]
Dy, Sydney [5 ]
Hempel, Susanne [3 ]
McDonald, Kathryn M. [6 ]
Rubenstein, Lisa V. [3 ,4 ]
Wachter, Robert M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds LS2 9LJ, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Karolinska Inst, Med Management Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[4] VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; CARE; FEEDBACK; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR; TRIALS; DESIGN; AUDIT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047993
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Theories provide a way of understanding and predicting the effects of patient safety practices (PSPs), interventions intended to prevent or mitigate harm caused by healthcare or risks of such harm. Yet most published evaluations make little or no explicit reference to theory, thereby hindering efforts to generalise findings from one context to another. Theories from a wide range of disciplines are potentially relevant to research on PSPs. Theory can be used in research to explain clinical and organisational behaviour, to guide the development and selection of PSPs, and in evaluating their implementation and mechanisms of action. One key recommendation from an expert consensus process is that researchers should describe the theoretical basis for chosen intervention components or provide an explicit logic model for 'why this PSP should work.' Future theory-driven evaluations would enhance generalisability and help build a cumulative understanding of the nature of change.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 459
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Angus D, 2006, IMPLEMENT SCI, V1, DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-1-4
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLOSING QUALITY GAP
[3]  
[Anonymous], Public Health, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0033-3506(02)00027-6
[4]  
Bickman L., 1987, USING PROGRAM THEORY
[5]   The science of quality improvement [J].
Bickman, Leonard .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (04) :391-391
[6]   Applying psychological theory to evidence-based clinical practice: Identifying factors predictive of taking intra-oral radiographs [J].
Bonetti, Debbie ;
Pitts, Nigel B. ;
Eccles, Martin ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy ;
Johnston, Marie ;
Steen, Nick ;
Glidewell, Liz ;
Thomas, Ruth ;
Maclennan, Graeme ;
Clarkson, Jan E. ;
Walker, Anne .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (07) :1889-1899
[7]   Exposing the key functions of a complex intervention for shared care in mental health: case study of a process evaluation [J].
Byng, Richard ;
Norman, Ian ;
Redfern, Sally ;
Jones, Roger .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (1)
[8]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[9]   You can get there from here:: Using a theory of change approach to plan urban education reform [J].
Connell, JP ;
Klem, AM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSULTATION, 2000, 11 (01) :93-120
[10]   Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance [J].
Craig, Peter ;
Dieppe, Paul ;
Macintyre, Sally ;
Michie, Susan ;
Nazareth, Irwin ;
Petticrew, Mark .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676) :979-983