The correlations between livelihood capitals and perceived recovery A longitudinal study in China after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake

被引:3
作者
Han, Ziqiang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Lei [3 ]
Wei, Jianwen [4 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Crisis Management Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Rocket Army Characterist Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Sociol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Livelihood; Recovery; Wenchuan earthquake; China; Assets; capital; UNITED-STATES; DISASTERS; POVERTY; TSUNAMI;
D O I
10.1108/DPM-08-2019-0237
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose This study examines the recovery of households after disasters from the sustainable livelihood approach (SLA) perspective. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes the perception of recovery by using a longitudinal household survey data set collected from a Chinese county devastated by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. The analysis compares the changes of livelihood capitals (financial, natural, physical, social, human) between 2012 and 2009 and recovery perception. Findings The results demonstrate that both the current status of financial, natural, and social capital and the changes of the capitals between 2009 and 2012 are positively correlated with the perceived level of recovery. The associations between the current status and the change of physical capital and recovery perception are insignificant. In contrast, with a greater change of human capital between 2009 and 2012, participants have a lower perception of recovery. Originality/value By investigating a longitudinal data, this study indicates that (1) household recovery should be considered as multidimensional, (2) the SLA could be a feasible framework to measure recovery, and (3) individual's recovery perception is dependent on the various dimensions of recovery measures.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 208
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [41] Rubin C., 2009, Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, V6
  • [42] Rubin C.B., 1990, DISASTER RECOVERY HU
  • [43] Shaw R., 2006, Disaster Prevention and Management, V7, P5, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560610654202
  • [44] Smith G., 2012, International Journal of Mass Emergencies Disasters, V30, P147, DOI 10.1177/028072701203000201
  • [45] Smith G., 2018, Handbook of Disaster Research, P595, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_28, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-428]
  • [46] Smith GavinP., 2007, HDB DISASTER RES, P234, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_14
  • [47] Long-term Life Recovery Processes Among Survivors of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake: 1999, 2001, 2003, and 2005 Life Recovery Social Survey Results
    Tatsuki, Shigeo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESEARCH, 2007, 2 (06) : 485 - 502
  • [48] Assessment of Livelihood Vulnerability to Drought: A Case Study in Dak Nong Province, Vietnam
    Thao, Nguyen Thi Thanh
    Khoi, Dao Nguyen
    Xuan, Tran Thanh
    Tychon, Bernard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2019, 10 (04) : 604 - 615
  • [49] Tierney K., 2012, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, V30, P123, DOI [DOI 10.1177/028072701203000210, 10.1177/028072701203000210]
  • [50] Twigg J., 2017, ODI WORKING PAPERS, P48